Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

thank you gabe

Results 1 to 44 of 44
  1. #1
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements

    Default thank you gabe

    Let me preface this a bit... I'm sure all of the long-time commune warriors remember that a lot of my old posts used to start off with "so I was working out today....", or "so I was driving home from the gym today....", and that I was always very into fitness and what not.

    The last 8 months or so I really havn't worked out at all, save for a scattered useless workout here and there. Before that I was probably only lifting like 2-3 times a week and maybe only a half hour per session at that. Somewhere along the line I had just lost all motivation. My diet has almost completely deteriorated and I drink way too much.

    Surprisingly, I'm still in pretty decent shape by the average person's standards, but IMO, I look like a complete mess, never have the energy I used to, and I basically just feel worthless.

    Anyway, Gabe IM's me today and asks for fitness advice basically. So we talk a bit and I'm trying to explain the basics of getting cut up and in good shape, and in the meantime, I got myself really pumped up, and *actually* went up to the gym today and did a workout.. a leg workout (i.e. the most important one) actually. My first leg workout in probably 2 years. My plan is to get up there and lift 3-4 times a week, eat healthy, and probably knock off 3x cardio a week (before breakfast when possible) for a while. The pools open up in 5 weeks so I'm probably cutting it a bit close, but I'm really excited and motivated right now so I'm happy about this.
  2. #2
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
  3. #3
    few things beat a good leg workout
  4. #4
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    My stories much the same and I'm about 2 weeks into finally getting back to the gym. It feels so good!
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  5. #5
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    few things beat a good leg workout
    I agree. walking out of the gym barely able to walk and slamming a shake down is undoubtedly one of the best feelings in the world. or at least, it used to be.
  6. #6
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    I put on ~5 lbs in the last 2 months and feel like a slob. Basically for similar reasons (except the eating part, still do that pretty well).
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    few things beat a good leg workout
    I agree. walking out of the gym barely able to walk and slamming a shake down is undoubtedly one of the best feelings in the world. or at least, it used to be.
    i once did a 3 month long training and peaking cycle for squats. basically did high weight low reps high velocity maximal effort type stuff twice a day seven days a week, altering intensities for recovery, and put on a bit of strength and size in the lower body. was very nice. it was the first time i did a program like that and was kinda amateurishly formatted, but it was still good. ive always enjoyed squats and deadlifts more than other lifts, and legs/back are easily the most pleasing muscles both asthetically and functionally

    i really need to start lifting again. i think my massage practitioner has fixed my hip/back/shoulder problems enough that i can, but its been so long that im having trouble wanting to get back into it even though i know i love it so much. i never did it to be in good shape either (even though its real hard to be in bad shape if you workout well and regularly). i appreciate being huge and strong over being ripped and generally fit

    when i get back into it i think i may be focusing on olympic lifts. would be very very sick if i could get a 300+ pound clean and jerk at a drug-free 215 pounds
  8. #8
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    This is just another example of significant others being the best motivators.
    LOL OPERATIONS
  9. #9
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    lol fags
  10. #10
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    This is just another example of significant others being the best motivators.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    lol fags
  11. #11
    What does it mean if I can go from 220 to 228 in one day, while eating very normal sized portions of food.

    Would this be the result of being severely dehydrated most of the time?
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  12. #12
    AHiltz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,969
    Location
    Coldbrook, NS
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    What does it mean if I can go from 220 to 228 in one day, while eating very normal sized portions of food.

    Would this be the result of being severely dehydrated most of the time?
    thyroid?
  13. #13
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    What does it mean if I can go from 220 to 228 in one day, while eating very normal sized portions of food.

    Would this be the result of being severely dehydrated most of the time?
    Tell your gifted lover to pull out?
    LOL OPERATIONS
  14. #14
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    What does it mean if I can go from 220 to 228 in one day, while eating very normal sized portions of food.

    Would this be the result of being severely dehydrated most of the time?
    probably something like being dehydrated and empty stomach to eating a nice big, salty meal (water retention) and drinking lots of water. for a 220 pound guy, 8 pounds in a day isn't terribly hard to do.
  15. #15
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    i once did a 3 month long training and peaking cycle for squats. basically did high weight low reps high velocity maximal effort type stuff twice a day seven days a week, altering intensities for recovery, and put on a bit of strength and size in the lower body. was very nice. it was the first time i did a program like that and was kinda amateurishly formatted, but it was still good. ive always enjoyed squats and deadlifts more than other lifts, and legs/back are easily the most pleasing muscles both asthetically and functionally
    even if it was a bit amateurishly formatted, putting maximal effort into squats is going to give you results. that's the more important part. i never claimed to "enjoy" doing squats and deadlifts like it was fun, but it was more of the bulding a house type fun. the satisfaction (and results) when all was said and done was easily worth it.

    whenever someone approaches me for lifting or fitness advice, i always try to emphasize how important it is to work your legs. then again, i havn't done any leg work in such a long time, but nobody ever said i practiced what i preach...

    i really need to start lifting again. i think my massage practitioner has fixed my hip/back/shoulder problems enough that i can, but its been so long that im having trouble wanting to get back into it even though i know i love it so much. i never did it to be in good shape either (even though its real hard to be in bad shape if you workout well and regularly). i appreciate being huge and strong over being ripped and generally fit
    yeah, i know what you mean. I always tried striving for a good balance, especially back when I played baseball. like i wanted to be a great ballplayer (i was), ripped (i was), and huge and strong (by, you know, high school standards). I would always emphasize power and speed over endurance, so when I ran, it was almost always sprints. i'd do a long distance run every now and then for cardiovascular reasons, but that just isn't very functional in baseball. sprints are. same can be said for lifts.. explosiveness is where it's at.

    when i get back into it i think i may be focusing on olympic lifts. would be very very sick if i could get a 300+ pound clean and jerk at a drug-free 215 pounds
    that would be very impressive. good form and safety before weight though, always.
  16. #16
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    lol fags
    pasty white skinny internet nerd that looks like a hippie
  17. #17
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    i'm pasty?
  18. #18
    been reading t-nation during work today cuz I be bored

    For those who might be wondering what programs could work for them (and have 15-20 minutes to kill reading)

    http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=1701042

    http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=1702383
  19. #19
    i used to post a ton on tnation, but left as the mods grew to dislike me. got my avatar thanks to tc. prof x still posting there telling everybody how he looks like a linebacker?

    i posted this a while back http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/for...ad.php?t=13432 as a parody to tnation. bodyrecomp is full of tnation haters (for good reason). its by far the best site ive found for info on pretty much all aspects of training/diet. i still post there but not nearly as much as i used to because most everybody there hates me now

    i also made some hilarious tc luoma facts (think chuck norris) that tnation wouldnt let me post because they thought it could possibly be taken as derogoratory. one of the number of reasons that site sucks.

    it does have some good basic information though. theres also a ton of weeds
  20. #20
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    why does it say 3-5 reps for strength, and 10-12 for size.

    I thought doing 10-12 limited the mass you gained. Does it fill, without adding new?

    I'm kinda confused.

    Also, this pause between reps isn't really explained. I typically do everything, slow down, 1/2 sec pause, controlled burst up. Is this basically the same thing? For most exercises, this involves the muscle always being under some stress/strain.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  21. #21
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  22. #22
    depends on the weight swiggidy...its generally optimal for mass building to do rep progressions to the point of failure...like if you can curl x pounds for x reps, and you want to build mass, you should attempt to curl x pounds for x+1 or +2 reps or until you can't anymore. then move up to higher weights. i'm not sure if that explains it well but the take home message is max reps at max weight equals more mass.
    do the right thing.
  23. #23
    you cannot take what you learn on tnation for theoretical value. trust me, they are alllllllllllll over the place with practice, and they pretty much never go into theory. on top of that, they're a supplement site that recycles shit endlessly. read the articles and boards for a couple years and youll notice they debunk certain stuff then later support it then later debunk it and on. they can do this because of the gigantic gullibility and turnover rate visitors.

    if you want to learn theory behind bodybuilding then you pretty much dont wanna go through bodybuilding venues. you'll find a much deeper understanding of what to do and why it works from more athletic endeavors that dont rely almost soley on drugs.

    i learned more about the theories from charlie francis (sprint coach) than almost anybody else.

    in a nutshell though, getting bigger muscles is a product of progressive overload. it doesnt much matter how you do it until you get into elite stages, but you really gotta just be activating the fast twitch fibers with enough volume/frequency/recovery to increase weights over time. this can be done with almost any kind of set/rep scheme. this can be done by going to failure or by not even getting close to failure. optimal tends to stray away from failure because that becomes a necessity for the elite stages.

    on top of that, if youre not eating enough youre not gonna build any muscle beyond going from really skinny to moderately skinny
  24. #24
    I eat 4k calories a day at 75kg body weight.

    My workout routine is this, I do it 2-3 times a week and is lacking a bit b/c I do it at home

    pull/chin-ups--as many sets to get to 20
    push-ups--3 sets with push-up bars at different hand widths
    deadlifts 3x8
    front squats with a clean 3x8
    OH presses 3x8
    pendlay rows 3x8
  25. #25
    btw I had been reading up on Starting Strength and I just don't know if it's going to give me the mass gains I might get from my routine.
  26. #26
    i, and most lifters, have found that in order to make continual progress we need to mix it up. ive done everything from 10x1 maximal effort or dynamic effort with very high frequency to 1x20 with lower frequency. its not a physiological requirement for progressive overload, but often is psychological.

    elite athletes have been made via sooooo many different kinds of paradigms. the extremes have been illustrated by the differences between eastern bloc countries and western countries. eastern bloc (think bulgaria) tends to do the same lifts over and over and over with a super super high frequency. they just regulate volume and intensity to aid recovery. on the flip side, the more western approach (partly popularized by westside barbell, but can be found in many other arenas like metal militia) uses a far more infrequent and creative approach. they do a ton of different kinds of lifts meant to emphasize different types of neuromuscular conditioning only a couple times a week.

    what matters is that both diametrically opposed approaches overall achieve similar volume/intensity/recovery to progress. they look much more different than they actually are though. that can be seen by the fact they all peak similarly
  27. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    push-ups--3 sets with push-up bars at different hand widths
    youre gonna hafta be doing jumping push ups or one arm (i dont suggest one arm since you have ohp in there) to get a good stimulus. i recommend not really even doing pushups anyways.

    the sternal head of the pectoralis major is activated heavily in pullups. im not sure how much the clavicular head is activated in overhead press though. ive been told its not much by those who do a ton ohp, but i do know it is activated. i imagine its enough, but it may not be. cycling exercises and focused body parts/lifts can be valuable tho
  28. #28
    First things first, english is my first language, not macho-workout guy speak.

    Secondly, I haven't found any other exercises that could work out my chest with just a pull-up bar, push-up bars, dumbbells and a barbell. I have no bench.
  29. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    First things first, english is my first language, not macho-workout guy speak.
    its called bro speak, bro.

    Secondly, I haven't found any other exercises that could work out my chest with just a pull-up bar, push-up bars, dumbbells and a barbell. I have no bench.
    pullups and overhead press work the chest. im not sure exactly how well overhead press does, but no doubt pullups are great for the sternal head (by far the largest part of the chest). the clavicular head (smaller and attached to the clavicle) is at least used in stabilizing overhead press. i believe its role goes beyond 'stability' because 'stabilizer muscles' is just one example of bodybuilding jargon that really has not merit in the real world because any muscle that is 'stabilizing' a lift (like abs during pullups) is getting a great workout.

    push ups are also kinda redundant when already doing overhead press. youre already using a bunch of the same muscles. i developed a common overuse injury in my deltoids due to simply too much upper body pressing volume.

    you could do legless push ups, but those are damn hard and still less than optimal since balance is a huge part of the exercise. theyre gonna be a lot better than reg pushups when you can do a bunch of them.

    i think with your set up (exactly like my home set up) you can get more bang for you buck if focus on olympic lifts and pull ups. pretty close to what guys like this did/do. hes definitely not shabby in the pectoral area, and its possible his are developed to the max. its really hard to know though since studying exercises based on looks is pretty much impossible. somebody like arnold had a huge chest not necessarily because he did a ton of chest lifts but because its just his genetics. theres still both nature and nurture involved, but how much we do not know



    of course to look like pyrros you gotta have steroids
  30. #30
    just did a workout

    pull-ups (20 in 4 sets)
    hang-clean (3x8)
    pendlay rows (3x8)
    deads (3x8)
    a few curl variations at the end

    how'd I do?
  31. #31
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    lol fags
    QFT
  32. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    just did a workout

    pull-ups (20 in 4 sets)
    hang-clean (3x8)
    pendlay rows (3x8)
    deads (3x8)
    a few curl variations at the end

    how'd I do?
    how close to failure?
  33. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Miffed22001
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    lol fags
    QFT
    yes lifting heavy stuff is the same as bro sex
  34. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    just did a workout

    pull-ups (20 in 4 sets)
    hang-clean (3x8)
    pendlay rows (3x8)
    deads (3x8)
    a few curl variations at the end

    how'd I do?
    how close to failure?
    pull-ups def. to failure

    deads pretty close as were the cleans

    rows/curls meh

    btw, I'm totally going for size, then strength. But size is numero uno
  35. #35
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    I do flys on the floor
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  36. #36
    all right, make sure that the only other bodyparts youre working on another day are upper body pressing. dont like add squats or something because this program is lower body intensive. its also back intensive. not the best for quads, but will still hit that some.

    do cleans first and dont do them to failure. failure on olympic lifts is way bad. theyre not designed for that at all. they're highly technical and meant for explosiveness. use them as kind of a primer of sorts but you can still get strong with them. however, if you just want bigness then you can actually drop them all together since theyre not the best for that. anything that has low time under tension and lacks an eccentric (lowering) phase isn't. they can work, but not best. however if you are getting stronger and eating enough then they will make you larger.

    deadlifts next. be sure to exclude an eccentric phase. for some reason, controlling the lowering of a deadlift can be very injurious. these are typically good for mass even though the only phase is concentric (raising). partly because they're such a maximal effort lift. theyre excellent for bang for buck, and with your setup they're almost mandatory. you want to do them before any other back/leg exercises because they're the most important ones to maintain good form and fatigue in back/leg muscles will hurt that. even pullups fatigue a muscle used in back extension.

    to pull ups next. no need to do rows really since the back is hit extremely heavily and completely by deads and pullups. you can add curls at the end i guess. i never much cared for curls. they're really really hard on the deltoids (which aided in injurying mine) partly because almost everybody does them wrong (if you do them 'right' you'll be using baby weights). the elbow flexors get hit real hard on pullups (also chinups, meaning supinated - palms facing towards you, they hit the flexors differently), and the last thing you want is to be an arm jockey. those are the stupidest looking motherfuckers around. they have big arms yet no lats, traps, rear delts, spinal erectors and such

    for the most part, avoid going to failure. it can be a decent way of doing things, but id honestly only like to do that with really particular programs that im not sure actually work well or not (like dan johns one lift a day you can find on tnation). waht you want typically is to stop about two reps shy of failure. thats enough intensity for mass gains, so what you want then is to have adequate volume. when you stop shy of failure your nervous system is able to put in more volume and appropriate intensities without overtraining, and thats exactly what you want for mass gains.

    cycle your days as heavy and light. if you have a heavy day then make sure the next day you lift the same bodyparts its a light day or even the next two days you lift. this allows your body to recover, but also keeps your motor learning intact. without recovery there are no gains, this is actually a form of active recovery.

    basically, as we get more and more advanced what we need is to have periods of greater volume and periods of greater recovery. so as a newb we can go heavy quite frequently and make gains without overtraining, but as we become more and more advanced in our neuromuscular coordination (strength, for the most part) our body expends more effort into the lifts and thus gets fatigued easier. by fatigue, i dont mean that we get 'tired' faster, actually the opposite happens, but that our nervous system does and it appears elsehow (like getting sick, losing appetite, not being able to sleep, generally pissed off)

    usually, the more advanced we become, the more frequently we need to lift heavy, but we also need to have longer and more frequent recovery periods. peaking for events like olympics involves cycles that can be around 3-4 months. when peaking correctly, athletes are actually substantially stronger. generally, most athletes are in a constant stage of fatigue, its just a matter of how much. optimizing the fitness/fatigue ratio is very hard to do, and usually just comes from experience and feel. the last year i was lifting i dropped all paperwork because i understood the theory and my body enough that i just wing it, and that was actually quite good.

    also, you may wanna drop 3x8 (even though its not bad) and do 5x5. 5x5 is pretty much the most efficient and simple program for both strength and size. its about as close to general optimization of intensity and volume. a few years ago i recall glenn pendlay writing up a huge post on totalelite forum (its not around anymore) about how he loves using 5x5 for just about everybody. it was great before he said it obv, but you mentioned him so i figure id mention him.

    also, your goal may be size, but that means your goal is also strength. it is impossible to synthesize muscle mass without getting stronger, and getting stronger directing aids getting bigger. there are some nuances involved with focusing on strength over size and vise versa, but really they're not that important. so when lifting just lift to get stronger. if youre getting stronger then it depends on eating to get bigger.


    and hmmmm all this talk making me wanna lift again.......alls i need is to just put like three weeks under my belt then i'll realize why i love it so much
  37. #37
    also, i dont really recommend doing both deadlifts and cleans during the same time period. you can do them, but even though they look the same, hip/shoulder position is way different for each.

    fwiw, olympic lifters almost never ever do deadlifts. they know or are just afraid deads with hinder their clean and snatch motor learning.

    something you could add if you want huge traps is hang snatches. i fucking love those. they're pretty sick for upper traps
  38. #38
    thanks for writing all that out

    one final question: I can do a lot more pull-ups with palms facing towards me (sup. grip, right?) than I can palms facing away.

    What would reasons for this be? My thoughts:
    -grip strength
    -forearm strength
    -improper form
  39. #39
    thats pretty standard actually. most if not all people naturally are stronger sup than prone. sometimes some are stronger prone, but when ive seen it it was because they did prone lifts and not sup. its really a different lift for the arm.

    im not exactly sure why this is. some say its because of biceps positioning. like just watch your biceps alter positioning/length as you transition from prone to sup. they say when sup they are in better position to exert strength.

    another could be different muscles used. i think all elbow flexion muscles are used during flexion, but it could be theyre used to different degrees and sup is where they're stronger.

    i could come up with a bunch of possible reasons this could be the case with pullups, but its the case with curls so that negates the back muscles.

    i really just dont know why. its normal though. you do, however, want to train both ways.

    back when i did a bunch of curls they were all sup and i ended up getting terrible pains in my forearms. i eventually did enough research to realize that was because i never did prone curls, so i started doing them and eventually the pain was alleviated. the reason for that was simply wrist flexors were way stronger than wrist extensors. muscle imbalance causes problems.

    which brings me to a point i often forget about why curls actually are good. they work the wrist muscles. pretty much all big lifts like deadlifts rows bench press dont.
  40. #40
    yea I've only been doing sup. pull-ups cuz I can do more

    guess I need to switch up the grips
  41. #41
    It has to do with muscle recruitment and biomechanics of certain joints. You recruit the biceps heavily when inverted.
  42. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    What does it mean if I can go from 220 to 228 in one day, while eating very normal sized portions of food.

    Would this be the result of being severely dehydrated most of the time?
    Tell your gifted lover to pull out?
    funniest thing i read all day!
  43. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    also, you may wanna drop 3x8 (even though its not bad) and do 5x5. 5x5 is pretty much the most efficient and simple program for both strength and size. its about as close to general optimization of intensity and volume
    general questions here:

    how many exercises do you do in a 5x5?
    how does the weight work for each set (is is the same weight or do you try and go up in weight or down in weight after each set)?
    are pull-ups 5 sets, or are they a few sets to fatigue?

    would this be a decent 5x5?

    deads 5x5
    squats 5x5
    presses 5x5
    pull-ups 3x??

    edit: like this http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow...5x5.htm#INTRO:
  44. #44
    yea thats fine. 5x5 as popularized by starr is one of the best and simplest programs to date. you can do it all pretty much however you want. ive forgotten most of the terminology for different variations of loading since ive been out of the community for so long, but you can load pretty much however you want; keep them all the same weight for one session then raise them if you should the next session, or ladder weight (like 200 first set, 210 second set, 220 third, 210 fourth, 200 fifth, 250 sixth, doesnt really matter), or ramp it up during the the session, or any other variation you can imagine, just get creative. you can vary eccentric speeds (typically, lower speed on the lower is a wee bit better for mass and safety), and vary weight yet lift explosively (that hits the fast twitch fibers very well but typically not optimal for mass), but it really doesnt matter. just do it all. what matters is progress over time, not progress from each workout. approach it the same way you approach poker and you're doing it right.

    another thing that can be done is not going heavy on every lift per session even if it's a heavier session. like if you go real heavy on deads youre gonna be pooped for squats. while it can be valuable to go heavy on squats (barring that not too heavy you increase injury likelyhood) but it can also be good not to. they work most of the same muscles.

    really it depends on how you structure stuff. ive personally learned that if im doing one lift for a bodypart im gonna balls to wall it so i dont feel like i need another one, but if im gonna do more than one then i dont balls to wall any particular lift, but once im done with all for that bodypart(s) im just as beat.

    also, dont think you hafta get beat to progress. sometimes you do but sometimes you dont, depends on how you structure it all. when i was doing about 14 sessions a week for lowerbody i was never beat after each session or day, but was at the end of the month. i did a bunch of singles and doubles with a weight i could handle well, trying to lift them faster and more technically correct, and over time i got stronger/bigger at a pretty fast rate for my training age.

    the dominant theory now is the fitness/fatigue model. basically, its that the more fatigue we induce the more fitness we can gain, but that fitness is veiled by fatigue. as fatigue dissipates then we see the newly gained fitness reveal itself. this theory fits perfectly into the understanding of peaking used by the most elite coaches. its why cycles can last for months instead of the popularized idea in the bodybuilding world that progress is session by session.


    wrt biceps in sup/prone: the reason jyms gives about recruitment is really the only reason ive learned it could be. however i do not thing its been established as fact. its something that came out of and probably has stayed in the bodybuilding community, and almost everything from there is hogwash and pseudo-scientific. no real sports deal with the distinction so if theres ever been studying done its gonna be real hard to find. scientific research of olympic sports has been way more than found in bodybuilding, despite what supp sites and enthusiasts lead us to believe.

    anyways so one reason i see that could be a factor is moment arm. i havent spent much time dicking around with it, but it seems leverages are different due to shoulder and elbow rotation when wrists are rotated, and that can easily change leverages which changes difficulty.

    i do think recruitment of the biceps is a key point though its just never been explained to me why the recruitment is different. ive heard insertion points change but i really doubt that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •