gay hands vs donks

[Renton]

Seat 1: burbaces ($187.35 in chips)
Seat 2: jenni69 ($185.85 in chips)
Seat 3: sIotmachine ($215.80 in chips)
Seat 4: vettejunkie ($490.10 in chips)
Seat 5: Renton555 ($256.20 in chips)
Seat 6: 03pearl ($231.75 in chips)
vettejunkie: posts small blind $1
Renton555: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Renton555 [Ts Th]
03pearl: folds
burbaces: raises $2 to $4
jenni69: folds
sIotmachine: folds
vettejunkie: folds
Renton555: raises $16 to $20
burbaces: calls $16
*** FLOP *** [5s 6s 6c]
Renton555: checks
burbaces: checks
*** TURN *** [5s 6s 6c] [7s]
Renton555: bets $34
burbaces: raises $34 to $68
Renton555: raises $168.20 to $236.20 and is all-in


villain aggro donk, like 40/22/2.5. I know i'm fpsing on the flop, but i just felt like checking was at least slightly greater than betting when considering that he's aggro and prob takes a stab with most of his range (and most of his range of course missed the flop).


POKERSTARS GAME #16885612991: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($1/$2) - 2008/04/21 - 06:22:29 (ET)
Table 'Spica IV' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: burbaces ($175.30 in chips)
Seat 4: vettejunkie ($564.70 in chips)
Seat 5: Renton555 ($303.05 in chips)
burbaces: posts small blind $1
vettejunkie: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Renton555 [Ks Jd]
Renton555: raises $4 to $6
burbaces: calls $5
vettejunkie: folds
*** FLOP *** [7h Ts Kd]
burbaces: checks
Renton555: bets $10
burbaces: calls $10
*** TURN *** [7h Ts Kd] [7s]
burbaces: checks
Renton555: bets $28
burbaces: calls $28
*** RIVER *** [7h Ts Kd 7s] [3h]
burbaces: checks
Renton555: bets $66
burbaces: raises $65.30 to $131.30 and is all-in
n_shlomo joins the table at seat #3
Renton555: calls $65.30

same donk, this hand happened before hand one and he had a 7 (if you need that for history to help with hand one). Do i have to fold this getting ridiculous odds? Was the bet in the first place too thin?



Seat 1: Renton555 ($208.35 in chips)
Seat 3: 76Dragon76 ($157.50 in chips)
Seat 4: lkjuio ($200 in chips)
Seat 5: neverlosing ($108.80 in chips)
Seat 6: Bolikk ($344.70 in chips)
Bolikk: posts small blind $1
Renton555: posts big blind $2
goodi23: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Renton555 [Kc Kd]
76Dragon76: calls $2
lkjuio: folds
neverlosing: folds
neverlosing is sitting out
Bolikk: calls $1
Renton555: raises $10 to $12
76Dragon76: calls $10
Bolikk: folds
*** FLOP *** [9s Jc 2d]
Renton555: bets $18
76Dragon76: calls $18
*** TURN *** [9s Jc 2d] [9d]
Renton555: bets $42
76Dragon76: raises $85.50 to $127.50 and is all-in
Renton555: calls $85.50

villain aggro donk, very similar stats to previous guy, very similar scenario except my hand's a fair bit stronger.

[pocketfours]

Hand 1. I like this line better when you are raising a limper from the blinds.

Hand 2. I like the value bet, and it doesn't really matter if you call with these odds. Probably still fold.

Hand 3. Meh spot.

[minSim]

Hand 1. Was that an attempted c/r or c/c on the flop?
(I don't really like a c/c line as you'll have a hard time on the turn.)
As played I like turn.
I'm just not sure about a c-bet or check on the flop.

Also against this aggro player I like bet/shove on the flop more than a check, if he's able to raise flops that likely missed you.


Hand 2. Any info on his WTSD?
I think river is ok, I would have folded tho.

Hand 3. Seems like a call to me.

[thizzSantaCruz]

hand 1 bet flop of course. As played its decision time, against a player incapable of bluffing I fold this
but if they are bluffy, its a good spot to get it in.

hand 2 If villain is the type of player where you have 3 streets of value against then his raise probably is
not a bluff.

hand 3 shitty spot, i probably don't fold because i am a station.