|
44 vs (pretty bad) lagg
My PT isn't working for some reason, so I don't have stats. Villain was playing a wide range pre and seemed to be willing to bet 3 streets with TP or better. I would ordinarily play much more aggro with a set and try to get it in, but I decided to play more passive with my big hand against this villain because he was so willing to bet. Is this bad?
On the river, I really wanted to raise for value, because I didn't see how he could have gotten here with a 6, but I wasn't sure what he could have that would call a shove which didn't beat me.
Looking back on the hand I feel I definitely should have raised the turn. I still kind of like my flop call because I was confident he would fire another bet with almost any hand with value.
Please correct me where I'm wrong because I felt really weird about this hand for some reason.
PokerStars Game #18147119647: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/06/15 - 04:18:29 (ET)
Table 'Demophon III' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Sulck ($51.05 in chips)
Seat 2: Thorty ($110.55 in chips)
Seat 3: hav0cLOL ($75.85 in chips)
Seat 4: 22pokermon22 ($27.45 in chips)
Seat 5: Juked07 ($64.85 in chips)
Seat 6: xLittlemanx ($51.80 in chips)
Sulck: posts small blind $0.25
Thorty: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Juked07 [4s 4c]
hav0cLOL: raises $1.50 to $2
22pokermon22: folds
Juked07: calls $2
xLittlemanx: folds
Sulck: folds
Thorty: folds
*** FLOP *** [Js 4h 7s]
hav0cLOL: bets $4
Juked07: calls $4
*** TURN *** [Js 4h 7s] [3d]
hav0cLOL: bets $9
Juked07: calls $9
*** RIVER *** [Js 4h 7s 3d] [5h]
hav0cLOL: bets $18
Juked07...
|