Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Flopped pocket underpairs

Results 1 to 60 of 60
  1. #1
    sarbox68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,115
    Location
    wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from

    Default Flopped pocket underpairs

    So I'm still struggling with this in general... Assume no reads except not a raving loonie. 100bb effective stacks.

    I have QQ UTG. PFR 4x. Flat called by CO or Bu. Blinds fold.
    Flop comes Axx. Based on reading a post specifically on this sh!t (ISF I think...? It's referred to alot, just don't have the link handy), I know check/call this so as not to fold out weaker hands. So assume I check, Bu 3/4 PSB.

    Assume a blank hits the Turn. Now what? I still could be drawing dead. Do I go into calldown mode, and if so, should I be willing to call a 1/2psb+ turn bet as well? I can't really donk out and rep the A on the turn, so I don't see what good that does on a brick.

    What I usually end up doing, is calling the flop bet and folding to a turn bet. Or if Turn goes check/check, I'll call a reasonable River bet on another brick.

    I'm trying to figure out the line between being a calling station drawing to a two-outer and being a weak-tightie getting pushed out on bluffs.

    Any suggestions on approach / thought process (or links to other posts that discuss this) would be helpful. Also, if I'm just not giving enough info to get a reasonable answer, pls let me know what else (besides detailed reads...) I should be looking for. Thx!!
  2. #2
    what stakes are we talking about? because down at pretend poker land aka micro stakes you loose loads of value by check calling.
  3. #3
    sarbox68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,115
    Location
    wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
    sorry... $25 6Max
  4. #4
    don't play 25nl and i don't play 6 max.
  5. #5
    At Micros (where I'm at) I struggle with this a lot.

    Ok, so I have a big pocket pair and an overcard (scare card) shows on the flop... if you're in position this isn't a big worry, but if you are first to act, it can be a problem. At the micros I seem to have more success betting it out... meaning when the flop comes I bet into it, the usual result is they fold unless they hold the overpair. It is not always the case though... if I'm at all concerned that they have skill, I tend to check then re-evaluate... often having to fold to the threatened overpair. I know I probably lose some value, but I'm unclear how else to handle it in the long run... ok I'm rambling now...
  6. #6
    I have found at these levels I do the same. If I raise on the flop and i am in m to late position I will almost always continuation bet with those kinda cards. My thinking
    1. continuation bet on the flop is cheaper to get information. The pot is still being built. so your 1/2 pot bet or 3/4 pot bet is going to be less than if done on the turn. and so forth.

    2. I honestly believe that information is not free, If you check and he should check you still don't know if he has a weak ace or slow playing or is holding kq. so basically you gave him a free card to see and you still don't know any more than what you did pre flop.

    This is how I play my live games and i tend to do the same online, please feel free to give me some advice if i am just completely playing this wrong. thanks
    Don
  7. #7
    I have the %Cbets called on flop stat up so I usually lead out the flop, if its called, depending on how high their Flop calling cbet% is and how high their turn calling cbet% ill double barrel. If thats called, usually C/F river without a good read. Ofcourse reads/history come b4 these stats. Both streets I fold to a raise. If he has a very low %cbet calling, then without a read i just check/fold turn. Important thing is to have enuff hands against them to make those stats relevant. If its a complete unknown, I usually B/F flop, B/F or C/F turn.
  8. #8
    Chopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,611
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    sar, you just described a spot that gives almost everyone trouble. i would tell you to mix up what you do, but more importantly, take good notes so you know WHO you can do what against in this spot.

    in 6max, i am more likely to play passively here. against and aggro, i am more likely to play passively here. against a passive, i want value out of middle pair hands and draws when i know he wont fold them.

    i may donk the turn. i may c/r the flop and lead the turn.

    i can tell you i am not leading 3 streets. and, i am probably not calling 3 streets against an unknown. but, i am also not leading strictly for information. i may get contrary info when i think i'm betting for value, but "info" is never my sole reason for betting/raising.

    oop, this sucks because a lot of 25NL players will instinctively bet when you check, no matter the street.
    LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.

    Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
  9. #9
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    Quote Originally Posted by L_Clan_Sup3rMaN
    I have the %Cbets called on flop stat up so I usually lead out the flop, if its called, depending on how high their Flop calling cbet% is and how high their turn calling cbet% ill double barrel. If thats called, usually C/F river without a good read. Ofcourse reads/history come b4 these stats. Both streets I fold to a raise. If he has a very low %cbet calling, then without a read i just check/fold turn. Important thing is to have enuff hands against them to make those stats relevant. If its a complete unknown, I usually B/F flop, B/F or C/F turn.
    Sounds like your taking a perfectly good hand, and turning it into a bluff. Why?

    The fact is, QQ is a fine hand. Lets think of Villains preflop calling range. Sure there's plenty of Ax hands in there, but there is also alot of PP's, and alot of SC's. Why are we trying to scare villain off of his second pair? We have a B range hand with showdown value, I'm not saying call down any bets. I'm just saying why turn it into a bluff? Let's say villain is holding JJ on a A93 flop. Don't you think you could get some value from these hands? What make's you think villain is going to fold his Ace to your two barrel?

    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038
    when the flop comes I bet into it, the usual result is they fold unless they hold the overpair.
    You are certainly more skilled than I, therefore this is a question. Why do you want to fold out most hands but the ones that beat you?(that really is a question, I'm not being a smartass.)
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by wellrounded08
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038
    when the flop comes I bet into it, the usual result is they fold unless they hold the overpair.
    You are certainly more skilled than I, therefore this is a question. Why do you want to fold out most hands but the ones that beat you?(that really is a question, I'm not being a smartass.)
    Ok, I'm trying to figure out the question... I have a pair of Qs, the flop shows an Ace... if he has Ax he has me beat... my continuation bet is to gain information and/or cause a fold... two reasons. The first is to find out what they hold... if I cbet into them and they call, they think they have a hand... and I get concerned about the Ace. If I cbet into them and they raise, they have me beat, instant fold. If I cbet into them and they fold, I won the hand...

    If they just call... that opens up a whole new arena for the turn... the turn is the decider.

    The second reason for betting is primarily because checking tells me nothing. If I check and they check, did they hit and are slow playing it? Did they miss? If I check and they bet, they have something worth playing but does it beat me?

    Mainly I use the bet in this situation to get a feel for where I stand... is it accurate? Somewhat... but it lets me have more information than just checking IMO... of course, take this whole thing with a grain of salt, I'm no pro.
  11. #11
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    sars, I cbet this alot so I don't get bluffed off my hand, keep ur cbet fairly small.

    I think ur getting confused with another post where we have KK on a A high flop and we are IP. We check here as there is no value in betting and we keep control by being IP.

    In ur example is very easy for villain to either bet the flop/turn when checked to and to bluffed off the pot.
  12. #12
    AnTman_69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    471
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Im with Superman on this one. Its all very read dependent, but i prefer a B/f here.
  13. #13
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Okay, so I don't play 6max, so it might be a different game. But I do have a few things to say no matter how wrong they may be.

    Quote Originally Posted by Monty
    If I cbet into them and they fold, I won the hand...
    I don't like this statement. It seems like you are striving to win the pot and not get maximum value. Yes you can c-bet and they can fold and you win the 8-10bb pot. However, you should strive to win the most when your ahead and lose the least when you are behind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard
    sars, I cbet this alot so I don't get bluffed off my hand, keep ur cbet fairly small.
    This seems a little counter-intuitative. With a had like and underpair, or second pair, you need them to bluff (or at least think their worse hands are good). For one, there are numerous ways of bluffing in this instance. If you are oop and check a player might bet out without the Ace to try to steal the pot. I believe this is the instance you are trying to avoid. However, even if you bet out there will be times when players bluff raise you without the ace, because a c-bet on an Axx flop looks so common. So you will still be folding the best hand at times. However, alot of players don't like to two-barrel while bluffing, and certainly a small number ever 3-barrel. So if you are oop and check the flop with QQ on Axx board, sure they may fire the flop but when called, and checked to again on the turn they will be less likely to bet again without TP or better. In this case they will often check behind (or even bet small enough that you can call again), then you can make a decision to check/call the river or bet/fold (or whatever depending on reads).

    Of course, this doesn't always stand for every underpair. QQ has a fair amount of showdown value on an Axx board, or Kxx board, (also remember players tend to bluff these boards more often). But smaller pairs may not have the same amount of showdown value and it would serve a much better purpose to c- bet (turn it into a bluff).

    That's just my line of thought. It could be fairly wrong, but I think a check/call oop, and a check behind in position are both the play to make in this instance. However, as I said, it may be wrong, so a better player is probably needed to explain.
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    Okay, so I don't play 6max, so it might be a different game. But I do have a few things to say no matter how wrong they may be.

    Quote Originally Posted by Monty
    If I cbet into them and they fold, I won the hand...
    I don't like this statement. It seems like you are striving to win the pot and not get maximum value. Yes you can c-bet and they can fold and you win the 8-10bb pot. However, you should strive to win the most when your ahead and lose the least when you are behind.
    Ok, maybe this isn't stated exactly right, but here goes... if I am ahead I can't know it because there is an overcard out there, one they are highly likely to have in their range and have paired... which makes me a little tense... so I'm trying to discern what they have while risking the minimum amount... so I bet usually 1/2 to 2/3 pot to both portray having paired the ace (their fear) and portray that I have higher cards than they do (their second fear) which will prompt a fold... still a winning situation...

    If they check and we then check it down, I win no more.

    If they bet and I put an Ace in their range, I have to fold, - value

    If I bet and they call... they still may have me beat but it builds the pot and gives me information... breakeven value in the long run possibly...

    If I bet and they raise, they paired the ace, I fold and control the amount lost.

    If I bet and they fold, I win the amount already in the pot without further risk.

    True, it may not be the best method of extracting maximum value out of the hand, but it also limits the cards coming so they can't 'make' their hand on the next street... for example, they hold a K and a K comes on the river... I've now 3-bet (assuming I continue to bet) and they hit me for a bigger loss.

    Maybe I play a little too defensively, but I'm still on level 1.5 thinking.
  15. #15
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038
    if I am ahead I can't know it because there is an overcard out there, one they are highly likely to have in their range and have paired... which makes me a little tense... so I'm trying to discern what they have while risking the minimum amount... so I bet usually 1/2 to 2/3 pot to both portray having paired the ace (their fear) and portray that I have higher cards than they do (their second fear) which will prompt a fold... still a winning situation...
    I understand what you are saying here. You would rather know on the flop where you stand in the hand than on later and more expensive streets, amirite? And I understand having a vulnerable hand can make one tense, this is to be expected because the marginal hands are always the toughest to play. However, I feel you are looking at some of the information incorrectly (could be me, mind you).

    If they check and we then check it down, I win no more.
    This probably won't happen very often. Because at some point you will either think your good or your opponent will think he is good (or can bluff at it) and there will be a bet put in.

    If they bet and I put an Ace in their range, I have to fold, - value
    Not necessarily. If you can ONLY put an Ace or better in their range then yes you can check/fold the flop, but that is rare. Remember, as we have a range of hands that we make certain moves with (think A and C ranges, where we either bet for value or bet as a bluff), villians are doing the same. So he may be valuebetting the flop with Ax, set, or 2pair, or he may be bluffing because he totally missed and sees this as his only opportunity to win. And like a said, few people double/triple barrel when bluffing. So if you check and he bets the flop and you call, then you can probably check/fold the turn being pretty confident you were behind.

    If I bet and they call... they still may have me beat but it builds the pot and gives me information... breakeven value in the long run possibly...
    Have you heard of floating?? Because this is a prime example of it. What's your plan for the turn after you c-bet oop and he calls on the flop? Check/fold? Because if so, then alot of players can easily float the flop with ATC against a player who b/f,c/f in this instance profitably. Also, why do you really want to build a pot, when you are doing it in a way that he is likely to have a better hand? In an instance such as this, you say it gives you information, but when you bet and he calls, that is not a good sign usually. So yeah it built a pot, one that you are likely to lose due to my above reasoning.

    If I bet and they raise, they paired the ace, I fold and control the amount lost.
    Maybe. Maybe not. You must remember players love to bluff, and some players love to trap. So you may c-bet here and still end up folding the best hand by a player who bluff raises you on the flop, or floats and steals on the turn/river. Or you may get a player who decides to trap and just calls, so then you check/fold the turn, or bet/fold the turn.

    If I bet and they fold, I win the amount already in the pot without further risk.
    Without further risk, yes. But also without further reward. I think your worried you will get attached to your hand and lose a stack in this instance if you don't bet the flop to "see where you stand". I'm not advocating playing a big pot in this instance against most players. And that won't happen if you check/call, check/fold or some similiar line. Your flop bet is gonna be relatively close to their flop bet, however the difference between you being the aggressor, or them, is that when your the aggressor in this instance, they are likely to call with better and fold worse (bad result). However, if they are the aggressor, whereas, they would fold their worse hands if you bet, they may now bet these hands. And like I said they aren't likely to go for 2-3 streets of value with them, so you can call a street (maybe two), then you realize you are beat. Getting more information, than you would have gotten had you bet imo, and paid about the same price, while also getting value from worse hands.

    True, it may not be the best method of extracting maximum value out of the hand, but it also limits the cards coming so they can't 'make' their hand on the next street... for example, they hold a K and a K comes on the river... I've now 3-bet (assuming I continue to bet) and they hit me for a bigger loss.
    I think this is a little bit of a situational dependent line that we haven't really accounted for given no specific hand history. It may be better to bet with more draws apparent, and check when it's more of a dry board. I'm sure this depends alot of the preflop action and opponent. So I don't think we can assume anything said so far is true in every instance.
  16. #16
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    What are we repping by c/c in a raised pot when we raised pre, on a Axx flop. A hand like the exact one we have... or a set of aces and 'slow' playing.

    It's an easy double barrel vs anyone competent.

    Anyway, basically it sucks to be OOP here and vs anyone half decent it's going to be tricky whatever we do.
  17. #17
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard
    What are we repping by c/c in a raised pot when we raised pre, on a Axx flop. A hand like the exact one we have... or a set of aces and 'slow' playing.

    It's an easy double barrel vs anyone competent.

    Anyway, basically it sucks to be OOP here and vs anyone half decent it's going to be tricky whatever we do.
    I agree completely, dont like the check/call for the same reason. But then, what do i know, just my opinion.
  18. #18
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    I'm not trying to argue with you regulars. Just trying to learn, so consider all my comments questions.

    I understand the Two barreling, but I just can't figure out what hands that beat us that we are folding out. Maybe KK. But they would've raise pre so that's most likely out. All we are folding is hands that we beat. And I can't get my head around that.
  19. #19
    well at micro fr you gain absolutely no value by checking. atleast not against 90 percent of the villans. Lets say you have Qs and the flop comes xxA if you check unless villan has the ace he will likely check behind but raise if he has the ace. Another reason you want to bet is you will get called by lots of pairs lower then your Qs. If you check you do not extract value from weaker hands and micro players for the most part don't bluff often enough to make up the difference
  20. #20
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    There are worse ways of playing this than just c/f'ing.

    Its not optimal, but it saves you spewing off when you're behind.

    well at micro fr you gain absolutely no value by checking. atleast not against 90 percent of the villans. Lets say you have Qs and the flop comes xxA if you check unless villan has the ace he will likely check behind but raise if he has the ace.
    This makes no sense.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  21. #21
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    God, this thread has some terrible thought processes and advice in it.

    If we bet and get called we have no information. None. We still dont know if he has Ax and we're value towning ourselves. We dont know if he has a smaller pair and we're getting value. We dont know if he's floating with air and planning to take it on the turn if we check. The only thing we know now is that we've managed to build a bigger pot with an underpair to the board with no idea if we're good or not. The only hands we've folded out are those who were behind us anyway and are probably fairly straightfoward players anyway.

    Hugely read dependant and I dont think theres a one size fits all answer but heres some thoughts:

    - We cant lose money we dont put in the pot.

    - Just because we check flop doesnt mean we cant bet turn or river.

    - A smaller PP only has 2 outs to improve v's us.

    - If its a drawy board and we bet, we have no idea if they're calling with a draw or with an ace.

    - If its a drawy board and we check, theres no law demanding we put money into the pot later if the draw comes in.


    Now it sounds like I'm a big fan of c/f'ing, but I rarely do that, however what I do depends a lot on reads on my opponents and a little on my image. Think of a line and theres probably an opponent I've taken that line against.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    There are worse ways of playing this than just c/f'ing.

    Its not optimal, but it saves you spewing off when you're behind.

    well at micro fr you gain absolutely no value by checking. atleast not against 90 percent of the villans. Lets say you have Qs and the flop comes xxA if you check unless villan has the ace he will likely check behind but raise if he has the ace.
    This makes no sense.
    well please explain what is confusing you. exactly how do you think we gain value by checking when villan will only bet if he has us beat ?
  23. #23
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Umm. That.

    If you believe he only bets if he has us beat, how can leading out possibly be the best line here?

    Heres a short question, you do realise we have 3 streets we can bet postflop right?
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    Umm. That.

    If you believe he only bets if he has us beat, how can leading out possibly be the best line here?

    Heres a short question, you do realise we have 3 streets we can bet postflop right?
    well we bet because he will call us on atleast the flop and turn with loads of hands that we beat. yes he only bets if he is infront but he will call with lots of trailing hands and yes he will sometimes fold but if he folds he likely wasn't gonna bet anyway
  25. #25
    Guest
    This is why being OOP sucks fat dick.
  26. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by littleogre
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    Umm. That.

    If you believe he only bets if he has us beat, how can leading out possibly be the best line here?

    Heres a short question, you do realise we have 3 streets we can bet postflop right?
    well we bet because he will call us on atleast the flop and turn with loads of hands that we beat. yes he only bets if he is infront but he will call with lots of trailing hands and yes he will sometimes fold but if he folds he likely wasn't gonna bet anyway
    Ok, I see what bj is saying and I see all of our points.. but the OOP is the biggest factor here, the flop sucks for us. One thing that I did want to add, he doesn't only bet if he is in front. IMO, which is worth a pile of horse crap, if I am in position, ace shows on the flop and even without the ace, it is checked to me, especially quickly, I'm repping the ace and betting, whether I have it or not.

    The size of my bet would be very read dependent though.

    Bj is correct this is a very read dependent situation also, personally this is one of the situations that gives me the most trouble.
  27. #27
    Guest
    If you're in position and it's checked to you, check behind. You want to induce a bluff from a busted draw or a smaller pp. This is a WA/WB situation, check flop, and evaluate on the turn.

    Think about it this way: your opponent has two or three outs if behind (if there are no other obvious draws) and you're not really afraid of giving him free cards. The only overcard that can come up is a king, and if your opponent has one there's only 3 left in the deck.

    If your opponent is ahead, betting into him is the WORST thing you can do. He's very unlikely to fold the ace. If he's behind, you only win the current pot. So betting is NO BETTER than checking it down to the river.

    If we say that we have value in this hand, then the best way to extract it would be to let the hands that are behind bet into us. Mid pps, gutshots, etc.

    If we're OOP, it sucks a lot more. We can't guarantee seeing a turn card by checking, but I think this is a good time to check. The only time betting would be good is if we could guarantee that a large part of the opponent's range is a draw on this board and we're getting called by worse enough.
  28. #28
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    Ok, sar, I know this thread is about 25NL, but if you don't mind, let me Hijack a little.


    Ok. In position, we all have a basic understanding of what to do there, not much need to dicuss it.
    OOP at 5NL or Less I don't think that there is ANY way that it is profitable to bet into this flop. Here's why:
    1.) Nearly any Ax hand is calling preflop, and will be willing to call down.(Alot of the time. That is infact the only thing that makes these stakes beautiful.)

    2.) If we bet and we get a call, that tells us nothing. If we 2 barrel and are called down, that tells us little to nothing.(Opp's are calling down rivers w/ shit pie sometimes)

    3.)If we c-bet we might fold out JJ- or middle pair- particularly if we haven't been c-betting the amount we should be. And/or. Villain is tight.

    4.) If villain checks behind, we can comfortably call most turn bets. (unless a K shows up or something.)

    5.)If we open the flop, we're just Value betting ourselves for the opponent who probably wouldn't do it right anyway IE-min bet I don't know about you, but I'm willing to call three streets of Min bets with this hand anyday.

    6.) As it has been said, and it stands true even at these stakes at times- People might just bet right into your check with any hand. (hoping to fold out hands like QQ-) And what better to call this with?

    7.) If you c/c. Your still easily getting value from second pair, JJ- because of #6. and if they do have the ace, your not loosing any more than you would have if you had C-bet(maybe even less in accordance with #5). Same for the turn. You're not loosing any more than you would have by 2-barreling. I know I Know, it's also about the FE when you bet into them. But 90% of the hands that you are actually folding out, you are beating. and only a few hands you beat are calling.
  29. #29
    i think one important question is how often does villan bluff/semi bluff
  30. #30
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    Quote Originally Posted by littleogre
    i think one important question is how often does villan bluff/semi bluff

    True, as well as, Will villain call with less than the Ace?(if we bet into them)
    IF:
    Yes- We still can't assume too much, since they still might have the ace
    No- No reason to bet.
  31. #31
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    If we vbet our Ax on the this flop most the time and cbet lower pairs never and just check air. We are going to be exploitable. Having thought about this, we should be betting some time/check calling others, there no hard and fast rule and depends on villain somewhat. Sure we have some showdown value, but anyone who's paying attention - and I admit this probably isn't many - will e able to exploit ur cbet or lack of and interpret your hand correctly, if you do the same thing with the same hands consistently.

    If I know you play QQ c/c re-evaluate turn line, I'm going to be double/tripling you a lot when you raise EP and c/A high flops - considering the fact you probably valuetown AK/AQ in this spot 99%.
  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    141
    Location
    Getting coolered.
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard
    If we vbet our Ax on the this flop most the time and cbet lower pairs never and just check air. We are going to be exploitable. Having thought about this, we should be betting some time/check calling others, there no hard and fast rule and depends on villain somewhat. Sure we have some showdown value, but anyone who's paying attention - and I admit this probably isn't many - will e able to exploit ur cbet or lack of and interpret your hand correctly, if you do the same thing with the same hands consistently.

    If I know you play QQ c/c re-evaluate turn line, I'm going to be double/tripling you a lot when you raise EP and c/A high flops - considering the fact you probably valuetown AK/AQ in this spot 99%.
    This makes sense but then it just means that we should mix up our game sometimes.
    So instead of always leading out with AK/AQ when we hit our ace, check/call flop to disguise our hand. Then when we lead out on turn and river villain is more likely to think we weren't strong on the flop and call us down with a weaker ace etc.

    This then also makes our QQ on the same board work more often (if they are paying attention), because if they've seen us showdown AK with the same line then they won't auto assume underpair.

    I'm slightly impatient. I normally lead out on this flop or check/raise it if i know villain likes to try and take pots away from me. Again of course it depends on the stats we have, if he calls c-bets very rarely then we know to slow down when called. If we know he plays very aggro and always bets at us whenever we check, we can check raise him or check/call him for two streets of value.

    Clar
    Disclaimer: I just started back and i'm not that good..
  33. #33
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Clar17y
    This makes sense but then it just means that we should mix up our game sometimes.
    Yeah, that's what I'm advocating. I think ppl have got into this thread that there is one right way of dealing with this flop OOP, but I think really you should mix it up here alot. If we c/c re-evaluate we are going to be easy to exploit if we cbet AK and don't cbet air/lower pairs.Mix it up vs competent opponents, keep it simple vs fish.


    Quote Originally Posted by Clar17y
    So instead of always leading out with AK/AQ when we hit our ace, check/call flop to disguise our hand. Then when we lead out on turn and river villain is more likely to think we weren't strong on the flop and call us down with a weaker ace etc.

    This then also makes our QQ on the same board work more often (if they are paying attention), because if they've seen us showdown AK with the same line then they won't auto assume underpair.
    Yeah this is one of the two options that you can employ, but I prefer the more aggro approach. c/c AK on A high flop is a bit too passive for me. I prefer to be cbetting alot, enough that I can get three streets of value w/AK. So I'd be cbetting air/lowerpairs/AK etc on this flop a large amount. I'm talking about cbetting enough that 77 etc calls us for at least one street.

    Quote Originally Posted by Clar17y
    ... lead out on this flop or check/raise it..
    c/r-ing this flop is terrible, we just pwn ourselves by getting all the worse hands to fold.
  34. #34
    Guest
    We should be checking this flop with an ace some of the time when there are no draws to induce a bluff.
  35. #35
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    villian doesnt know you're holding QQ. play it like you would AK/Q. unless opp is really agg, then ch/cl'ing is fine because he'll bet at your "weakness" (which is what you want him to do). just call down the river and take his bluffing monies

  36. #36
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by frosst
    villian doesnt know you're holding QQ. play it like you would AK/Q
    I think you misunderstood the whole point of this thread. We have SD value. Betting three streets like we would AQ/AK is terrible and it turns our hand into a bluff.
  37. #37
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by frosst
    villian doesnt know you're holding QQ. play it like you would AK/Q. unless opp is really agg, then ch/cl'ing is fine because he'll bet at your "weakness" (which is what you want him to do). just call down the river and take his bluffing monies :wink:
    I'm inducing a bluff with TPTK for pot control
  38. #38
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    I'm inducing a bluff with TPTK for pot control
    wat?

    Do you understand how unlimited hold-them works?
  39. #39
    Guest
    Well, it depends on whether the other guy is going to pay you off more often or bluff. Against a station it's obviously better to bet, against an aggressive player it's better to play pot control. Most people won't call a flop bet and a turn bet with a pp unimproved, but lots of people will bet with an unimproved pair.

    generally we play big pots with big hands
    TPTK is not a big hand

    or it could go down like this:
    cbet and check turn with TPTK
  40. #40
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    Well, it depends on whether the other guy is going to pay you off more often or bluff. Against a station it's obviously better to bet, against an aggressive player it's better to play pot control. Most people won't call a flop bet and a turn bet with a pp unimproved, but lots of people will bet with an unimproved pair.

    generally we play big pots with big hands
    TPTK is not a big hand

    or it could go down like this:
    cbet and check turn with TPTK
    I don't know what planet your on but TPTK is a pretty big hand in 6max and I'm goign to be felting it a fair amount vs the right villains. Sure in FR I might use a check on the turn for pot control, but I'm never c/c the flop for pot control lul. Stick to limit imo
  41. #41
    Guest
    wait, hold on where does it say it's 6max
    although the OP does say in his sig "I needz to learn 6max"

    obviously you're going to get called a lot more in 6max because everyone thinks you're full of shit
  42. #42
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    Quote Originally Posted by frosst
    villian doesnt know you're holding QQ. play it like you would AK/Q on flop and turn
    fmp

    At 10nl and 25nl, leading out isn't a bluff. worse hands will call alot. so I still plan on getting to the river (bet sizing). plus, the point of repping the AQ/K is so when I have it, I'll play it the same as I played my QQ. it opp calls down and sees I will bet down, he'll be more likely to call or reraise with a weaker A on an A high flop. Although we're talking about this specific situation, I'm thinking about this situation in relation to how it'll affect my image, future hands, and thus profitibality. you can't argue ch/cl'ing because we have no reads on villian, so we can assume the same from him (he has no reads on us) so he has no reason to not believe we have an A in our hand. But we won't know for sure what he has until we reach the river, assuming we/he stays in that far. but basically, if he calls a flop and turn bet on a dry board, we can assume we're beat and ch/fold the river. or if you want info, call.

  43. #43
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    I think this thread got worse. Why cant I rate it 1 again.

    Why are you turning QQ into a bluff?
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  44. #44
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    read dependent
  45. #45
    sarbox68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,115
    Location
    wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    wait, hold on where does it say it's 6max
    although the OP does say in his sig "I needz to learn 6max"

    obviously you're going to get called a lot more in 6max because everyone thinks you're full of shit
    Quote Originally Posted by sarbox68
    sorry... $25 6Max
    I quote myself... the 3rd sign of insanity
  46. #46
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard
    We have SD value. Betting three streets like we would AQ/AK is terrible and it turns our hand into a bluff.

    Why are you turning QQ into a bluff?

    EXACTLY!

    I don't know what planet your on but TPTK is a pretty big hand in 6max and I'm goign to be felting it a fair amount vs the right villains. Sure in FR I might use a check on the turn for pot control, but I'm never c/c the flop for pot control lul.

    EXACTLY. And the same applies to FR 2NL/5NL stakes. (Obviously you can't be a dumbshit, you have to pay attention to villains line. Watch for trips etc...)

    If we vbet our Ax on the this flop most the time and cbet lower pairs never and just check air. We are going to be exploitable. Having thought about this, we should be betting some time/check calling others, there no hard and fast rule and depends on villain somewhat. Sure we have some showdown value, but anyone who's paying attention - and I admit this probably isn't many - will e able to exploit ur cbet or lack of and interpret your hand correctly, if you do the same thing with the same hands consistently.

    If I know you play QQ c/c re-evaluate turn line, I'm going to be double/tripling you a lot when you raise EP and c/A high flops - considering the fact you probably valuetown AK/AQ in this spot 99%.

    This is the first truely reasonable argument I've seen for betting this flop. And your (obviously) right, I didn't consider that. At 2nl & 5NL, this plays less of a role I think, but plays one none the less.
  47. #47
    sarbox68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,115
    Location
    wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard
    If we vbet our Ax on the this flop most the time and cbet lower pairs never and just check air. We are going to be exploitable. Having thought about this, we should be betting some time/check calling others, there no hard and fast rule and depends on villain somewhat. Sure we have some showdown value, but anyone who's paying attention - and I admit this probably isn't many - will e able to exploit ur cbet or lack of and interpret your hand correctly, if you do the same thing with the same hands consistently.

    If I know you play QQ c/c re-evaluate turn line, I'm going to be double/tripling you a lot when you raise EP and c/A high flops - considering the fact you probably valuetown AK/AQ in this spot 99%.
    Agreed, mix the sh!t up always. I think versus a vry tight opp I'm leaning towards cbetting with balls one street, and if they call (w/ no strong draws), I'm likely to give them a pass on having the A and switch to pot control if they'll let me -- unless a strong read that they'll fold to double barrell. Against a looser opp, I'm happier to double barrell, prolly fold the turn to a raise. Assuming still in there by the River (and I don't have 1/3 of my stack already in...), no K added to the mix I'll prolly check/fold the river. If already pot committed, I'm check/calling.

    I know at $10NL, most vills will not lay down TPTK w/ an Ace. So it's unlikely I'm going to be pushing them out. Haven't played enuff $25 to know if that still holds...
  48. #48
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    I think this thread got worse. Why cant I rate it 1 again.

    Why are you turning QQ into a bluff?

    to counter the below statement......

    Quote Originally Posted by Muzzard

    If I know you play QQ c/c re-evaluate turn line, I'm going to be double/tripling you a lot when you raise EP and c/A high flops - considering the fact you probably valuetown AK/AQ in this spot 99%.
    villian now has to expand my range and try to find out if i have QQ or AK/Q. so when my bluff works, i make money with QQ. when he looks me up when i have AK/Q, i make more money.

  49. #49
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    You guys are WAY overrating balanced ranges at micro-stakes in edge case situations. Play your hand profitably based on its own merits and leaving balancing for times when someone might actually notice.


    [edit] If you really want to balance your c-betting range on A high flops to get action when you have an A, then balance your Ax hands with hands that DONT have showdown value. Why are you wasting a good hand turning it into a bluff? Thats what your 89s preflop raises are for.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  50. #50
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Looking back, I think it depends alot of the opponent. If the opponent is known to be tricky and float with alot of hands, such as small pps, suited connectors, or overs, then I like a b/f line on the flop. But I don't think double barreling is all that good because then we fold out what we beat, that would most likely bet if we check to him on the turn, and only keep in what beats us. So, while I don't mind a check/call line, it probably isn't best as the preflop aggressor. So instead, would a b/f, c/c, c/f (or b/f) line be better, against a tricky/solid player?

    For one, the flop would be balanced with the times you do show up with TP or better. If we were to double barrel the turn, then we do fold out everything we beat, and only hands that beat us will stick around. However, if we check it wouldbe exactly what he expects us to do the majority of the time we c-bet with air. Then he would swoop in with a bet and expect to pick up the pot. However, we would be c/cing because we expect him to be floating with alot of air, waiting to do just this (which would probably get us a free card the times we have a draw or little showdown value and he checks behind the turn. Not to mention it would decrease the frequency of his floats against us). Then we can confidently c/f the river, or in some cases against some villians b/f.

    I'm just throwing that out there. The line came from spoon I believe, when I asked him really quickly what he thought. I just took the line and tried to apply logic to see why it works and how, and it think it does rather well.

    This is of course when we are the preflop aggressor. If for some instance I were to call an open in say the SB/BB with QQ, I would be check/calling the flop witha very high frequency.
  51. #51
    settecba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    354
    Location
    stealing blinds from UTG
    Stacks makes perfect sense to me...i like the line he suggests
    Quote Originally Posted by ISF
    Getting good at poker is like that scene in the matrix where Neo suddenly sees that everyone is just a bunch of structured numbers and then he starts bending those numbers in really weird ways.
  52. #52
    I was thinking about this thread while playing this hand. Right to fold here ?

    $1 NL Hold'em - 30 Players (tourney)
    Seat 1: wher*** (2106.00 in chips)
    Seat 2: jonw*** (9855.00 in chips)
    Seat 4: Melt*** (11399.00 in chips)
    Seat 5: youh*** (4536.00 in chips)
    Seat 7: sona*** (1799.00 in chips)
    Seat 8: Hero (3589.00 in chips)
    Seat 10: fkpr*** (11716.00 in chips)
    sona***: posts small blind $100
    Hero: posts big blind $200
    Dealt to Hero[ Jd Js ]
    fkpr***: folds
    wher***: folds
    jonw***: calls
    Melt***: folds
    youh***: calls
    sona***: folds
    Hero: raises to $600
    jonw***: calls
    youh***: calls
    @@@ F_L_O_P @@@ [ 8s 8h Ad ]
    Hero: checks
    jonw***: checks
    youh***: bets $950
    Hero: folds
    jonw***: folds
    jonw***: mucks
    youh***: returns uncalled bet $950
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    youh***: mucks
    youh*** wins $1,900
  53. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    This is why being OOP sucks fat dick.
  54. #54
    Sarbox:

    I think the idea is to figure out how much of his range beats you, whether he will bet 100% of the time when he's in position, likely ahead, and checked to. Then try to figure out how much of the rest of his air he bets when checked to as a bluff.

    Air or a marginal pair is way more likely than a hand that beats you, so more often than not it's a question of whether he checks behind with so much of the air in his range that it becomes unprofitable to call when he bets or not.
  55. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Location
    Live Poker Room
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038

    Ok, maybe this isn't stated exactly right, but here goes... if I am ahead I can't know it because there is an overcard out there, one they are highly likely to have in their range and have paired... which makes me a little tense... so I'm trying to discern what they have while risking the minimum amount... so I bet usually 1/2 to 2/3 pot to both portray having paired the ace (their fear) and portray that I have higher cards than they do (their second fear) which will prompt a fold... still a winning situation...
    If they check and we then check it down, I win no more.

    If they bet and I put an Ace in their range, I have to fold, - value

    If I bet and they call... they still may have me beat but it builds the pot and gives me information... breakeven value in the long run possibly...
    ...
    I think a pot sized bet would portray more strength, 1/2 to 2/3 looks a little bit weak to me.
  56. #56
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    Quote Originally Posted by LuckySlevin
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038

    Ok, maybe this isn't stated exactly right, but here goes... if I am ahead I can't know it because there is an overcard out there, one they are highly likely to have in their range and have paired... which makes me a little tense... so I'm trying to discern what they have while risking the minimum amount... so I bet usually 1/2 to 2/3 pot to both portray having paired the ace (their fear) and portray that I have higher cards than they do (their second fear) which will prompt a fold... still a winning situation...
    If they check and we then check it down, I win no more.

    If they bet and I put an Ace in their range, I have to fold, - value

    If I bet and they call... they still may have me beat but it builds the pot and gives me information... breakeven value in the long run possibly...
    ...
    I think a pot sized bet would portray more strength, 1/2 to 2/3 looks a little bit weak to me.


    It's already been established that this is the wrong logic for betting. This thread IS getting worse...
  57. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Location
    Live Poker Room
    I was speaking of the bet size, whereas bjaust was speaking about the validity of betting in the first place, they are related concepts but not the same wellrounded.
  58. #58
    wellrounded08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    377
    Location
    ...Good Question........Where am I?
    1.)The bet sizing would be completely situational. I'm not going to bet pot as a bluff where 2/3 would work especially to "Find out if I'm beat"(the flawed logic). Not to say i've never overbet a bluff in the heat of a game, but here, discussing it, It's best to not suggest that we bet more than we need to when we could EASILY be beat.

    2.)By quoting that Specific reason to bet, it would suggest that you aggree with the quoted reason. Perhaps different wording, or quoting a different reason would make it more clear.

    Slevin.
  59. #59
    Guest
    Slevin, if our bet looks weak, it's better than if it looks strong. If our bet looks weak we could be looked up by someone with a weaker hand, but if it looks strong we'll only be looked up by someone with a stronger hand.

    In fact that makes me think that this might be a situation for a flop blocking bet if those exist
  60. #60
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    I haven't read all responses but I def. agree with some and disagree with others. Not sure why this thread is so long tbh. It's completely read dependent on how villain plays postflop and there seems to be a billion lines they can take. Think about what they call with on the flop if you bet and how they'd play the turn when you take different lines as well as the river. Then think about how they'd play if you check flop. I'd say at microstakes it's better to check behind most of the time vs. the std "TAGs" and bet with second pair most of the time vs. fish. TAGs won't pay you off with crap and fish will. Most TAGs also won't bluff you off your hand. You can think a lot more into this and get to the exact types of lines each villain will play their range with to try and understand it better.

    Btw - very rarely do you care what villain thinks you have at micros so stop balancing like a monkey. But then again, that's read specific too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •