Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Couple of potentially too thin vb's on 4-straight vs donkeys

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Halv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,196
    Location
    No hindsight for the blind.

    Default Couple of potentially too thin vb's on 4-straight vs donkeys

    Hand 1, villain is 44/9, passive station.

    Button ($1086.40)
    SB ($404.50)
    Hero (BB) ($445)
    UTG ($1066.55)
    MP ($433.50)
    CO ($800)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with K, A
    3 folds, Button calls $4, 1 fold, Hero raises $18, Button calls $18

    Flop: ($46) 2, A, 4 (2 players)
    Hero bets $32

    Turn: ($110) 6 (2 players)
    Hero bets $80, Button calls $80

    River: ($270) 5 (2 players)
    Hero bets $130

    --

    Hand 2, villain runs ~41/6 over 80 hands, wtsd 21 and high agg%'s though these obv haven't converged at all yet. No read but he's no JoeThePro!


    BB ($445.30)
    UTG ($400)
    Hero (MP) ($1034.50)
    CO ($400)
    Button ($783.20)
    SB ($472)

    Preflop: Hero is MP with 9, A
    1 fold, Hero raises $14, 3 folds, BB calls $10

    Flop: ($30) A, 9, J (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $24, BB calls $24

    Turn: ($78) Q (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $50, BB calls $50

    River: ($178) 8 (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $110
  2. #2
    I'm fine with 1 but I think 2 is borderline. Technically your hand is stronger in the 2nd hand but the board is worse/may hit his range a little harder on average. I also think you get more calls by worse hands in the first one than the second, although both of these guys are probably capable of astonishing feats of derring-d'oh!.
  3. #3
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by dalecooper
    I'm fine with 1 but I think 2 is borderline. Technically your hand is stronger in the 2nd hand but the board is worse/may hit his range a little harder on average. I also think you get more calls by worse hands in the first one than the second, although both of these guys are probably capable of astonishing feats of derring-d'oh!.
    i think this is well put and i dont know what else to add. im definitely happier betting the river in 1 than 2, but i still think donks like this look you up with worse.

    i would probably leave out villains river action in both hands to encourage more discussion.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  4. #4
    both
  5. #5
    cardsman1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,261
    Location
    Being enjoyed at Jack's Bar since 1397
    What would be bad about checking the river behind in hand 2? If he was thinking I could see the bet but we're talking bad players....
    Operation Grind For Education:

    Current BR: $10080(04/06/2009) BR Goal: $15000--I LOVE RB!!!
    End date: 31aug2009
    Current stakes: $100/200NL FR
  6. #6
    my turn bet in hand 1 would be bigger
  7. #7
    Bet/fold both seems good to me.
  8. #8
    i really feel like you can bet 180 or 190 on the river on hand 1 and get the same result.
  9. #9
    nutsinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,839
    Location
    flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
    1 is good, 2 too is prob too thin; i like betting a smaller amount.
    My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
  10. #10
    1) Yea bet bigger ~180 but this is good/std
    2)what midstakes donk said
    Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //

    Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •