Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumTournament Poker

Action Overdose [15+1]

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker

    Default Action Overdose [15+1]

    What do we do here?
    UTG has not been very involved in the game thus far, with only a few stuttersteps and head fakes here and there, nothing special.
    Considering dead cash, their possible shove ranges, and the stacks behind hero, WTF do we do here?


    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $15+$1 Tournament, 100/200 Blinds (8 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com



    UTG (t1390)
    UTG+1 (t760)
    MP1 (t1278)
    Jizzy Sawya (MP2) (t2385)
    CO (t3105)
    Button (t2890)
    SB (t247)
    BB (t1445)

    Jizzy Sawya's M: 7.95



    Preflop: Jizzy Sawya is MP2 with ,
    UTG raises to t1390 (All-In), UTG+1 calls t760 (All-In), 1 folds, Jizzy Sawya??????
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  2. #2
    insta fold.

    Your well behind normal UTG shove range. AQ+,AJs+ 88+
    UTG+1 has a range dominated with over cards
    SB calls ATC (but he only steals some of your equity.

    Your equity is almost certain to go up after this hand, so fold and enjoy it. TT may be tougher
    This is not my signature. I just write this at the bottom of every post.
  3. #3
    rong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,033
    Location
    behind you with an axe
    yep, you're relying on trips to take that one. I wouldn't even play TT here, prob not JJ either. Just too much risk.
    I'm the king of bongo, baby I'm the king of bongo bong.
  4. #4
    Straight forward fold for me as well, you're either flipping or dominated here so you don't have sufficient pot odds against their ranges.

    TT and JJ are closer and are read dependent on UTG's and UTG+1's range. Missing that HUD already?
  5. #5
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by taipan168
    Missing that HUD already?

    Not at all, LOL! And I actually had their ranges spot on.

    Code:
     39,847,818,780  games    73.481 secs   542,287,377  games/sec
    
    Board: 
    Dead:  
    
    	equity 	win 	tie 	      pots won 	pots tied	
    Hand 0: 	34.388%  	34.28% 	00.10% 	   13661507352 	 41430036.00   { 8h8s }
    Hand 1: 	32.806%  	31.47% 	01.33% 	   12541402626 	531038070.00   { TT+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
    Hand 2: 	32.806%  	31.47% 	01.33% 	   12541402626 	531038070.00   { TT+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
    If we had exactly equal stacks, should this not be a call?
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  6. #6
    that's a super loose range for UTG, ginger's looks fine to me, maybe add KQs.

    You don't want to flip here or more or less ever I don't think in an SNG with 0 FE.

    Also don't forget you don't close the action. Between that and some ICM tax it's a fold.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    753
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    EZ fold here imo. Much better to maintain my stack size and keep the fold equity I have here then to call on a flip and lose. I think I'd need to be TT+ to shove over.
  8. #8
    Yep, insta-fold for me, I think the ranges you use are way too loose


  9. #9
    UTG's range should be enough to make this a fold.. Especially if he hasn't been involved..
    don't listen to a thing I say.. I can't beat 6.50s..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •