|
|
 Originally Posted by Deanglow
definitely cbet
Originally Posted by Renton
i would c/f
Ok guys, if this isn't indicative of needing a little more elaboration I don't know what is.
I'll take a stab:
Villain (a 34/9) is probably calling a 3b with a fairly wide range -- A good chunk of his opening range. If his continuing range is TT+ / any club then there's a lot of broadways without clubs that are probably folding.
For every unpaired broadway hand in his range, there's 16 combos but only 4 of those have at least one club in them. So even if we give villain a range of {AK,AQ,KQ, TT+}, there are 36 broadways that are folding, 12 that are continuing and 6+6+6+6+3 = 27 pairs that are continuing. So 39 combos continuing vs 36 that are folding = a 2/3rd pot cbet should yield some profit. Throw in more broadways and it's even better, take out KQ and it's worse.
This of course assumes villain does fold broadways without clubs. It also doesn't talk about our equity when we're called.
|
Reply With Quote