|
|
AQs - not aggressive enough?
Pretty standard situation, AQs dealt preflop, flush draw on flop. I opted not to 3-bet preflop, if this is questionable do let me know your opinion. I'm most concerned about my postflop play here. Villain's flop bet is quite weird, because if he does have a K then why is he allowing me proper odds to call on a flush draw? Further, why is he checking the turn but betting the river? He could have been slowplaying a small set, again very strange on a board of this type, or he may have deduced that I have nothing and would win with a bet.
All commentary welcome, even if insulting.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, 6.5 Tournament, 100/200 Blinds (8 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
MP1 (t1425)
Hero (MP2) (t7655)
CO (t2370)
Button (t5230)
SB (t2620)
BB (t6020)
UTG (t3885)
UTG+1 (t6090)
Hero's M: 25.52
Preflop: Hero is MP2 with A , Q
UTG calls t200, UTG+1 bets t600, 1 fold, Hero calls t600, 5 folds
Flop: (t1700) 6 , 3 , K (2 players)
UTG+1 bets t600, Hero calls t600
Turn: (t2900) 3 (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero checks
River: (t2900) 8 (2 players)
UTG+1 bets t1200, Hero folds
Total pot: t2900
Results:
UTG+1 didn't show
Outcome: UTG+1 won t2900
|