|
|
 Originally Posted by Lukie
This will probably sound ridiculous, but I consider any table with a fish to be a good table. e.g. myself, 4 normal tagg regulars, and a fish is a table I pretty much won't close down unless I'm ending my session.
We probably even have very different ideas on what constitutes a fish. A player that open limps, maybe calls too much and is generally pretty passive and bad but who doesn't make huge mistakes after the flop is still a fish in my book. The type that calls down with any piece on most any board is so rare and when they do come around they go broke so fast. It's kind of sad but that's the reality of the games on pokerstars.
i mean, non-us ppl probably exaggerate the difference; even on a site like PKR which probably has the highest fish ratio anywhere (whee 3D graphics!), it s not like the 2-4 games are crawling with fish
BUT the crazy thing is that most of the regs are stuck in 2007 mode. that s the biggest difference i see. the good taggs and laggs just stick out like a bunch of sore thumbs.
|
Reply With Quote