|
|
After reading my post, I guess I'll ask the question more clearly.
Late in the tourney, you're already in the money, but there is alot more to come if you:
A: Stay patient, and hopefully hit a decent hand to push with.
B: Let yourself be blinded out, while lasting as long as you can waiting for a premium hand.
C: Adjust your card-quality requirements to fit the need for more chips and let it ride with a low PP or any sub-decent hand as a last-ditch effort to stay in competition.
Does either A,B or C always apply in that situation?
The longer you wait, the less chips in your stack to gain with an AI. The AI may lose, and 5 or 10 more spots worth of time you spent by going AI were sacrificed, leaving you with a lesser prize. It is a possibility that 55 is the best hand you will see in any of these situations. I had 55, 88, 44, and another I can't remember in the last hour of play. But very high AI bets occurred before my chance to call the BB each time, and I decided longevity in the tourney was more important than calling high raises with a PP. Am I making any sense here?
|