Trap backfires...

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[Fnord]

Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?

***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[!Luck]

I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[jmrogers7]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[gutshot]

WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[Fnord]

That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.

My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.

Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...

It's bell02

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[jmrogers7]

All I can say is

Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Ragingguitarist18]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Fnord]

he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.

It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.

[Xianti]

P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....

Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"




Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.