{This post has been removed}
07-14-2004 05:00 AM
#1
| |
Guest
|
Analytical vs Instictive Play{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 05:12 AM
#2
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 05:45 AM
#3
| |
| |
07-14-2004 05:54 AM
#4
| |
Great Article , agree with the most part of it . | |
07-14-2004 05:55 AM
#5
| |
I'll start a poll | |
| |
07-14-2004 06:01 AM
#6
| |
Anyway i still think you can make an aproach based on maths and instict combining the best of each field, but since ive been working in my game, especially in Tournments the Key is Playing the Player, and if cards arent coming you will only stay alive with Cirugical Bluff´s,and risking more than you should, and i completly agree Instict its a big part of the game but needs to be TAMED. | |
07-14-2004 06:27 AM
#7
| |
Yeah, i'd agree with what leon just said. You be a numbers cruncher and still have moves to your game, you know. I'm an odds cruncher kind of guy. Sometimes I raise with rags....but I do it for a reason. I'm not hoping to be called, I think I can steal the blinds. If I'm called and miss the flop, I might bet my rags again if I think they didn't have anything. Being an odds guy doesn't mean you can't make a move without cards. | |
07-14-2004 06:51 AM
#8
| |
Re: Analytical vs Instictive Play
| |
| |
07-14-2004 09:52 AM
#9
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 10:02 AM
#10
| |
The best part of that road trip is that he's calculating his odds including outs that he will bluff with. | |
07-14-2004 11:09 AM
#11
| |
I think that anyone who is a contributor to this forum knows that you cannot simply play "by the book" poker and expect to be successful However, I think that the opposite side of this argument is also true. You cannot play the "Feel" side of poker exclusively and expect to be successful either. | |
| |
07-14-2004 11:24 AM
#12
| |
Guest
|
Re: Analytical vs Instictive Play{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 11:29 AM
#13
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 11:34 AM
#14
| |
Guest
|
{This post has been removed} |
07-14-2004 11:51 AM
#15
| |
Probably the biggest problem with poker in playing in any given tournament is that, over the short-term (one tournament, one session in a ring game, one home game), you are largely at the mercy of luck. If you have it then that, coupled with your above average poker skills will most likely allow you to prevail or at least fare very well. If you don't have it, no matter how soundly you play you will most likely not do very well. | |
| |
07-14-2004 11:58 AM
#16
| |
| |
| |
07-14-2004 12:18 PM
#17
| |
| |
| |
07-15-2004 02:56 AM
#18
| |
|
Re: Analytical vs Instictive Play
|
07-15-2004 03:31 AM
#19
| |
| |