12-28-2004 07:21 PM
#1
| |
| |
12-28-2004 07:24 PM
#2
| |
go with the 300BB rule for limit | |
| |
12-28-2004 07:26 PM
#3
| |
300 big blinds is the usual guideline, sooo...100 / 300 = .33. So, a .25/.50 limit game would be fine (blinds of .25 and .10). | |
| |
12-28-2004 07:28 PM
#4
| |
| |
| |
12-28-2004 07:28 PM
#5
| |
| |
12-28-2004 07:34 PM
#6
| |
Ack, I was wrong. Ok, strike that, so, micro-limits for $100 bankroll then? | |
| |
12-29-2004 09:58 AM
#7
| |
12-29-2004 12:05 PM
#8
| |
Words of wisdom from Fnord, who probably stole it from someone else: | |
12-29-2004 01:58 PM
#9
| |
bb = big blinds | |
01-03-2005 08:25 PM
#10
| |
So, I've got 783 hands at .50/1 at Party and I'm at -2.79BB/100. Is that statistically significant enough to be concerned about or just variance? Fortunately tournament play has made up for the small loss, but should I start thinking about heading back to .25/.50 where I was at +11.55 BB/100 or stick it out a while longer? | |
| |
01-03-2005 08:34 PM
#11
| |
I think that most of the guys will say that your sample size is too small... | |
| |
01-03-2005 08:35 PM
#12
| |
You might have some leaks that didn't show up in the lower limit but the new players are taking advantage of it. | |