|
|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Obvious troll. Subtle leanings are just as important as huge conclusions as long as you keep perspective.
The -100bb/100 for folding forces us to play a wider range than position alone makes sensible.
The wide range means we are playing with hands that don't generally play well OOP, but even still, the EV is better than -100bb/100.
Playing speculative hands w/o initiative or position is, in general, throwing chips away.
So we respond by widening our 3-betting range while thinning our calling range, always keeping in mind how we exploit the villains in the hand.
A fold to 3bet stat should be pretty high, if we're assuming it's somewhere around 0.7 that's like 25% of the time he folds 4 hands in row to a 3bet, which isn't going to be massively exploitable yet for some people this is justification that he is massively exploitable.
I understand all the rest but there are lots of better hands to 3bet imo than AJo, so even if we are having a pretty wide 3bet range in this spot (and I don't like calling much) I don't think AJo falls into it.
|
Reply With Quote