Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

2NL As Kc Hand-typed HH

Results 1 to 23 of 23

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Mcash2 View Post
    First of all, that you for your analysis. But I think you are a little premature to reprimand me for posting frivolous posts. I am new to the site and have posted close to 10 HH's already. If you read those, you will see that is not my intent. I am working on SpoonItNow's course. I stated with CB's, so a few threads back, I began posting the hand in 2 portions; PF to flop and then the rest of the hand. So keeping along those established lines, I posted thread this up to the flop first as usual. If I had posted the whole thing outright, it is possible that the complete hand may have unintentionally changed views on the flop action. What I really want is opinions the rest of the hand. Place for value-bet the river and anything else that someone thinks not frivolous. Give me a change please. I try not ton aggravate. Only asking for help.
    Having an 80% c-bet at 2nl isn't a problem, it might not be optimal but it's not going to be bad. ESPECIALLY when you're only raising 9% of hands, your holdings on the flop are going to be strong by default because you open such a tight range. Which is why sorting your pre-flop ranges out so they aren't awful (which they are) is much more important. Then your c-bet will naturally drop because you'll have more weaker hands on flops that you won't want to bet.

    Two birds, one stone.

    It's really important to realise that our pre-flop ranges dictate so much what we are doing. Not only do the effect all our other decisions but because we make those decisions most often the amount we win/lose as a result is huge. Which brings us to another important point that plugging your biggest leaks (your pre-flop ranges) is more important than plugging smaller leakes (your c-bet%)

    You're also letting stats dictate to you what you're doing which is completely the wrong way to go about it. Stats may point to a problem but if someone tells you x is good and you're doing y making arbitrary decisions to get closer to x is really bad instead look at your game and analyse why you're at y.
    Last edited by Savy; 06-23-2017 at 07:31 AM.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    Having an 80% c-bet at 2nl isn't a problem, it might not be optimal but it's not going to be bad. ESPECIALLY when you're only raising 9% of hands, your holdings on the flop are going to be strong by default because you open such a tight range. Which is why sorting your pre-flop ranges out so they aren't awful (which they are) is much more important. Then your c-bet will naturally drop because you'll have more weaker hands on flops that you won't want to bet.
    Makes sense Savy. Obviously if I'm only raising nit hands, then surely I'm likely to CB more frequently with those hands, and skew my CB stats upward. I'm finding it hard to raise from UTG with things like AJs, ATs, and KJs. I have lost big hands the past with them being dominated. But that just goes to show that I also have some big post-flop leaks that need shoring. I am going to play those type hands that I fear, and play them very conservatively at first. Honestly. Starting now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •