Bluffcatcher vs. 3-barrels from the BTN

Villain is a total unknown (zoom) but stack size obviously suggests a fish or a shortstacker.

Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BTN: $13.08 (52.3 bb)
SB: $31.37 (125.5 bb)
Hero (BB): $31.47 (125.9 bb)
UTG: $20.31 (81.2 bb)
MP: $30.24 (121 bb)
CO: $27.98 (111.9 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q 9
3 folds, BTN raises to $0.75, SB folds, Hero calls $0.50

Flop: ($1.60) 2 6 Q (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $1.25, Hero calls $1.25

Turn: ($4.10) 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $2, Hero calls $2

River: ($8.10) T (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $9.08 and is all-in

Hero???

hero doesn't call river

Fold river. In general, I'd only look to bluff-catch with reads and a decent sample size, plus I'd need a better kicker.

Not ever bluff catching a triple from an unknown at these stakes sounds like a solid strategy. Fold river.

Fold or 3bet preflop imo.

Originally Posted by abelardx

Fold or 3bet preflop imo.

Yeah preflop is probably slightly bad. Stack size and lack of knowing anything makes this hand a biot too weak to defend to a 3x on my semi arbitrary scale of feel.

So everyone seems to hate stationing this down.

Given that, if we were the BTN, and let's say we brick a heart draw or 78, does everyone therefore like triple-barreling a lot on this runout?