|
|
 Originally Posted by seven-deuce
I have changed my opinion on this debate, Savy is correct. It's better to play optimally or as close to it vs unknowns and then deviate from optimal in order to exploit a leak. Knowing what optimal play is in a certain spot makes it easier to spot your opponent's sub-optimal play.
genuine question re the above. Savvy, you are probably best placed to answer this well.
is it not better to deviate from optimal (i'm assuming you mean GTO in this context) in the way that you know is most likely to exploit population norms when you're up against an unknown? unless you think that unknowns are likely to be very, very good?
|
Reply With Quote