Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

BUT WHAT'S YOUR RANGE

Results 1 to 75 of 128

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters View Post
    Treating someone as a fish because they limp and then isoing them/c betting pretty wide vs them IP is a bread and butter way of printing a lot of money over a big sample. Treating them as an unknown and playing GTO vs them is a really good way to fail to make all this money.
    Well done mate, that's clearly exactly what my post said. In the future I'll make sure I find and replace all "don't over adjust" with "DO NOT ADJUST AT ALL" as they're clearly synonymous.

    The whole idea that you have that we always need to make massive adjustments to get the most EV out of people is exactly is what will stop you getting the most EV out of people.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
    Well done mate, that's clearly exactly what my post said. In the future I'll make sure I find and replace all "don't over adjust" with "DO NOT ADJUST AT ALL" as they're clearly synonymous.

    The whole idea that you have that we always need to make massive adjustments to get the most EV out of people is exactly is what will stop you getting the most EV out of people.
    lol pot-kettle. If I've exaggerated your view it's not been intentional, it's just genuinely the way your post sounded. Seems like the majority of people haven't misconstrued or exaggerated my original post in the above way so I'm happy with that I guess.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters View Post
    lol pot-kettle. If I've exaggerated your view it's not been intentional, it's just genuinely the way your post sounded. Seems like the majority of people haven't misconstrued or exaggerated my original post in the above way so I'm happy with that I guess.
    It isn't pot kettle at all, you really don't seem to understand this. Also it's pathetic that your view point is that because I said something which disagrees with your post, which I genuinely think is wrong, you think it's a good thing that you misunderstood me. Sounds like you need to grow up, we should be capable of having debates about things without turning to throwing petty insults around.

    The idea behind my posts is to discuss what the thread is about, it isn't let's try and be a dick to Carroters so stop taking the stuff I say as if it's a personal attack.
  4. #4
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
    Sounds like you need to grow up, we should be capable of having debates about things without turning to throwing petty insults around.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    I'll just have to assume I did this loads in my previous posts. I'm pretty sure I didn't but if I did I apologise. Also note being blunt isn't being insulting, nor is disagreeing with someone and saying they are wrong, so I'm not sorry about any of that.
  6. #6
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Am I the only one who sees the irony in saying this:
    Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
    Sounds like you need to grow up
    and this:

    Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
    we should be capable of having debates about things without turning to throwing petty insults around.
    in the same sentence?
  7. #7
    ImSavy is doing an expert job of trolling this thread.
  8. #8
    Lots of good posts in this thread, one of the few long threads I've bothered to read on any forum ever. Some great stuff, some slightly worse stuff, but plenty which make me think.

    Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
    Sounds like you need to grow up, we should be capable of having debates about things without turning to throwing petty insults around.
    The only person to insult anyone was you, and you did it on multiple occasions. I think you need to go back through this thread and read your posts again Savy and it should stand out to you pretty clearly. Aside from that looked like a solid debate to me and I took plenty out of it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •