|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
Reverse implied odds is basically the money we lose on future streets when we pay more bets with our hand. Since he's all in, we can't lose any more money, so it's simply a case of range vs pot odds. I suspect we're good to call here. Had the king flopped, I'd be more inclined to fold, but even then the number of flush draws in his range might make it a call.
And don't be sorry about leaving out stats, it's just that posting them means you'll get better responses, so it's in your interest to give as much info about villains as you know.
Once again - Thanks a lot. I really do appreciate it. I'm trying to make sure I learn from each and every session at this point as I really need to put these nanostakes behind me.
I made the mistake of looking at my overall winnings for the session around that hand and saw how much I had dropped back down and folded on that turn K as a result. I guess in the future I'll make sure I don't peak so I don't let previous hands effect a future hand.
|
Reply With Quote