PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.01/$0.02 - 8 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker

UTG: $2.41 (121 bb)
UTG+1: $1.32 (66 bb)
MP (Hero): $2.77 (139 bb)
MP+1: $3.61 (181 bb)
CO: $2.10 (105 bb)
BU: $2.00 (100 bb)
SB: $1.95 (98 bb)
BB: $1.54 (77 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is MP with J♣ J♦
2 players fold, Hero raises to $0.06, 4 players fold, BB calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.13) 2♥ 5♦ 5♠ (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.04, BB calls $0.04

Turn: ($0.21) 5♣ (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.08, BB calls $0.08

River: ($0.37) A♦ (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks

Total pot: $0.37 (Rake: $0.01)

Showdown:
MP (Hero) mucks J♣ J♦ (a full house, Fives full of Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 67%, Flop: 70%, Turn: 91%, River: 0%)

BB shows A♠ 3♠ (a full house, Fives full of Aces)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 33%, Flop: 30%, Turn: 9%, River: 100%)

BB wins $0.36

I figure villain has A-high much of the time when he calls the c-bet also possible are 43s, Suited broadways and some middle pocket pairs, 2x and rarely the 5.I bet about 1/3 pot because I want to keep all his bad hands in the pot I have been following Jon Little's content lately and he says small stakes you should c-bet smaller than half pot unless scary board I didn't consider this one too scary, tell me, what do you think, do you agree or should it be standard half pot minimum. Another 5 comes making it less likely for him to hold a 5. Suited broadways might give-up with no backdoor flush besides A-high because of showdown equity? villain calls the roughly 1/3 pot again and river brings an A. Villain checks and I think this hits his range good so I check behind and he shows A3ss. Would you have bet more first 2 streets or was the hand fine?