|
 Originally Posted by StarGrinder
True, but A9s is a better one pair hand than A2s-A5s when villains calling with worse Ax and you can often get two streets of value (sometimes 3 when bluff catching) with the added benefit of making the nut flush. A2s-A5s does make a straight but are you really stacking off every time with the ass end on some 534xx board?
I'm not playing AXs to make a pair. I play AK, AQ, KQ, AJ, etc to make pairs. If I happen to get weak pair with an A kicker, that is a complicated situation which I have make decisions about, but I was playing the hand to make a nut flush, so anything else is not my goal and complicates my line.
Am I stacking off with XXX every time?
In all cases, the answer is no. My holdings do not exclusively determine my bets. Pot odds, Villain's habits and our history play a significant role.
That said, if I choose to 3-bet an EP open from a reg when I have A2s from BB, then yeah... I fully expect my wheel straight to not be dominated by them showing up with 76 at showdown.
Villain's ranges matter.
 Originally Posted by StarGrinder
As well as 4b bluffs from EP/MP vs 3bet happy villains who have position on us. Although I doubt this is a strategy I'd recommend for low micro stakes as balancing your 4b range is prob entirely unnecessary.
It's not a good strategy for beginners, I agree. That's why I said, "if it's profitable at all."
|