Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

Nit check-calls pairing turn, barrel river?

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The problem with this particular turn card is the strength of his c/c range.

    If the turn was some brick 6x, then I would say his turn c/c range is probably Jx, 8x some mid pair hand. Probably not top pair. I think ppl can convince themselves of letting go of mid/bottom pair to another river bet.

    Now on a Jx turn people will show up with AA, AK/KQ and sometimes even Jx c/c the turn. So now they have a stronger c/c range AND the FD bricks AND you rep only Jx.

    I like it much more if the flush gets there. Though note, after thinking about the above I do agree that our Tx doesn't have that much SD value on the river, but I still don't think we get enough folds.

    And you don't need to rationalize disagreeing, that's the whole point of posting hands!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24 View Post
    The problem with this particular turn card is the strength of his c/c range.

    If the turn was some brick 6x, then I would say his turn c/c range is probably Jx, 8x some mid pair hand. Probably not top pair. I think ppl can convince themselves of letting go of mid/bottom pair to another river bet.
    Agreed. I see how this turn makes his c/c range much stronger.

    Now on a Jx turn people will show up with AA, AK/KQ and sometimes even Jx c/c the turn. So now they have a stronger c/c range AND the FD bricks AND you rep only Jx.

    I like it much more if the flush gets there.
    You see that really doesn't compute, so I obviously need to think about this more. I really don't like it if the flush gets there - I think after we flat the flop, we've decided to play a draw passively and are more likely to check behind the turn for the free card, so I think flatting the flop then betting turn with a supposed FD looks suspicious.

    I can see how narrow we rep though, since I can't think of anything at all that {flat flop, bet turn when checked to} looks like other than Jx.

    And you don't need to rationalize disagreeing, that's the whole point of posting hands!
    Thanks! I just don't want to come across like I'm trying to rationalise or make excuses for my play - I mean, I'm here to learn, so yeah I'm often going to disagree, but it's not because I think I know better.
    Last edited by BorisTheSpider; 09-05-2013 at 01:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •