As for naming the stats, don't sweat it.
Just study exactly what each stat is telling you before using it to motivate a decision.

This player's VPIP is 43%. That's OK for when it's folded (or limped) to you on the BTN, and assuming this stat is an average over all positions, we can conclude that this player's pre-flop hand selection is stupidly wide, and that he's relying on his Villains to fold a lot to his aggressive bets post-flop in order to recoup his terrible pre-flop losses. It's about impossible for this player to be positionally aware with a VPIP that high.
No other position plays even 1/2 as wide as the button. If button is opening ~40% of hands when limped or folded to them, CO can raise a bit over ~20% of hands and HJ is down to less than 15%. Those are the positions you play the most hands from and just averaging over those hands is way less than 40%.

Their PFR is a healthy fraction of their VPIP, which probably means they're not limping in too often pre. It's a little bit low, but that probably can be attributed to calling raises in late position, as this Villain doesn't likely fold many suited cards or any Ax PRE.

Oh god damn it. I've been assuming that all the hands that were used to accumulate those stats were played 9-handed, and you haven't even told me how many players were in this hand when the cards were dealt.
These stats are about useless without knowing that much. We at least need to know that the stats were collected from similar hands to this one, or we can't extrapolate.
43% VPIP is abysmal for 9-handed, but only pretty bad for 6-handed.


This is what I mean by saying we need to know exactly what each stat is telling us before we can use the stat constructively.