...
|
02-08-2005 05:56 PM
#1
| |
![]()
|
|
|
02-08-2005 07:37 PM
#2
| |
![]()
|
I am not, by any means, a MTT guru. Nonetheless, I wanted to reply. Personally, by reading a lot of your posts, I think that you are an excellent player. I think that you provide a lot of incite to the game on these boards. |
|
02-08-2005 08:45 PM
#3
| |
![]()
|
KJ against the blinds in generally a good move. You played it right. The problem is that you will run into great hands once in a while, which was unlucky. |
| |
|
02-09-2005 12:32 AM
#4
| |
![]()
|
|
|
02-09-2005 01:47 AM
#5
| |
Dominating SnGs? Care to share some of your strategies on SnG's, Im currently trying to tack the 10$ tables, but I am having a bit of a rough time doing so. | |
|
02-09-2005 10:38 AM
#6
| |
![]()
|
My SnG strategy is to get ITM. I don't care if I take 1st or not. That's #1. I don't care if I limp into 3rd place with 5 chips left. There are two finishing positions - ITM or Not. |
|
02-09-2005 11:07 AM
#7
| |
Something I have realized recently about SnGs is that if you want to come in the money regularly, you have learn how to play small stacked. I have been working on this part of my game because I it was a major weakness that kept me out of the money. In the last 5 SnGs I've played, every one I have dropped to the small stack below 9BBs usually with 5-6 players left and come back to make the money (1,2,1,3,2). I am not talking about limping into the money, I am talking about walking into the money with a stack of consequence... Radashack goes over small stack play in his tourney advice section which is what I have based my strategy on. | |
|
02-09-2005 02:53 PM
#8
| |
1 word. Experience. | |
| |
|
02-09-2005 03:38 PM
#9
| |
![]()
|
I agree with Rada. And I'm going to read that short stack strategy. |