|
|
 Originally Posted by gingerwizard
I was not playing my cards. I had top pair and 9 outs to the flush. But his 100 into 600 looked weak on the flop repping 1 pair at the most so i pushed the turn figuring i was probably ahead anyway with outs to the flush, but really looking for the fold.
You stated as part of your read that he was a minbet-aholic. If someone is basically only minbetting, then you can't use the fact that he minbet as a sign of weakness. With an 800 chip pot, betting something like 500-600 is a far better play - you don't go broke when you're wrong. You said you weren't playing your cards, but then justified the play by explaining your holding, so I'll address it: with only one card to come, the 9 outs to the flush aren't as helpful as they seem. If you're behind, you will improve only 18-24% of the time (depending on if the 3 is live or not). Basically, this is either a way ahead or way behind situation. I'd much rather keep the pot relatively small in such a situation - if he has nothing, he'll likely fold to a smaller bet at least as often as to a larger one (as overbets typically scream draw and weakness [though I'll admit that chances are this guy was too dull to know that anyway]).
 Originally Posted by gingerwizard
This is the play im asking about. I was not betting for value i just thought his steal was weak and i'd take it off him. Are you saying that i don't need the chips badly enough to pull this at an early stage or that this is a bad move anyway you look at it?
In essence, yes, that's what I'm saying. Do you want the chips? Sure. But you don't need them bad enough to risk 2k to win 800 when the only way you get called is when your 25% to win. If you think you may be ahead now, then check/call to the showdown seems best to me (especially given that opp is letting you do so for cheap). If you think you are behind but that your opp is weak (this isn't even really possible at this point), then bet out, but don't bet the house on it.
|