What the hell is going on here?
Did I handle this correctly? Ordinarily I'm all about slamming my chips in with an OESD and flush draw, but this felt like a bad situation. New to the table, so the only reads I have on these players are what you see here, pretty much. Usually when I see a player with large stack engaging in some check-re-raising, I'm thinking he's decent.
***** Hand History for Game 4550915741 *****
$50 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, June 19, 15:24:27 ET 2006
Table Table 109831 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: Suomela1 ( $45.50 )
Seat 2: Julesemm ( $36.75 )
Seat 4: JDCA6 ( $97.75 )
Seat 5: UDONTWANTIT1 ( $110.26 )
Seat 6: stressball10 ( $48.25 )
Seat 3: cholo_jones ( $40.75 )
UDONTWANTIT1 posts small blind [$0.25].
stressball10 posts big blind [$0.50].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to stressball10 [ 4d 8d ]
Suomela1 calls [$0.50].
Julesemm folds.
cholo_jones folds.
JDCA6 calls [$0.50].
UDONTWANTIT1 calls [$0.25].
stressball10 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 3d, 2c, 5d ]
UDONTWANTIT1 checks.
stressball10 bets [$1.25].
Suomela1 folds.
JDCA6 raises [$3.40].
UDONTWANTIT1 raises [$8.90].
stressball10 calls [$7.65].
JDCA6 folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 2h ]
UDONTWANTIT1 bets [$24].
stressball10 folds.
Re: What the hell is going on here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalecooper
** Dealing Flop ** [ 3d, 2c, 5d ]
UDONTWANTIT1 checks.
stressball10 bets [$1.25].
Suomela1 folds.
JDCA6 raises [$3.40].
UDONTWANTIT1 raises [$8.90].
stressball10 folds
JDCA6 folds.
fixed your hand history.
With a raise and a re-raise you are likely way behind here. For the str8, any 4 is a split, 46 (and maybe 47 have you drawing dead, and almost any 2 diamonds kill your flush. check raise is likely a set/A4 or 2 pair and the turn 2 puts the boat possibility out there. There are much better spots to gamble.
Re: What the hell is going on here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Bones
With a raise and a re-raise you are likely way behind here. For the str8, any 4 is a split, 46 (and maybe 47 have you drawing dead, and almost any 2 diamonds kill your flush. check raise is likely a set/A4 or 2 pair and the turn 2 puts the boat possibility out there. There are much better spots to gamble.
Is being super-tight the new hobby around here? Two way:
Board: 3d 2c 5d
Dead:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 43.2456 % 39.46% 03.79% { 8d4d }
Hand 2: 56.7544 % 52.97% 03.79% { 55, 33-22, A4s, 64s, 53s, A4o, 64o, 53o }
1,246,140 games 0.329 secs 3,787,659 games/sec
Three way:
Board: 2c 3d 5d
Dead:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 31.7448 % 27.96% 03.79% { 8d4d }
Hand 2: 37.6635 % 31.14% 06.53% { 55, 33-22, A4s, 64s, A4o, 64o }
Hand 3: 30.5917 % 24.45% 06.14% { 55-22, AdTd, Ad9d, Ad8d, Ad7d, Ad6d, A4s, 7d6d, 64s, A4o, 64o }
--
I can imagine few scenarios here in which I am a significant dog - I'd have to have some very accurate reads to think I was way behind to either of these guys, let alone both of them. I'm getting laid 2:1 from the pot with three way action and strong implied odds. About the only problem is that I'm not confident in both of my draws. If I thought both of the players would call, I actually think there's a good case for just pushing here. The problem is that I think there's a strong chance the first raiser folds (as he did even without me pushing), which takes some of my odds away. Tell me if you think the above hand ranges are off - I happen to think they're very close to correct on two moderately aggressive players. In fact I think the hand range for the first raiser here was too tight - I didn't include any of the overpairs that he could easily make that first raise with. The check-raiser's range is a lot scarier IMO.