QQ lc on paired board

***** Hand History for Game 5138962097 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, September 09, 23:30:00 ET 2004
Table Monster #1293388 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: lane1977 ( $69.35 )
Seat 2: FidLcashflo ( $73.63 )
Seat 3: asafbaron ( $245.84 )
Seat 4: nutroke ( $100 )
Seat 6: roginager ( $195.50 )
Seat 5: AATrain01 ( $111.85 )
asafbaron posts small blind [$0.50].
nutroke posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to AATrain01 [ Qd Qc ]
AATrain01 raises [$4].
roginager calls [$4].
lane1977 folds.
FidLcashflo folds.
asafbaron calls [$3.50].
nutroke folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, Jd, 5h ]

asafbaron checks.
AATrain01 bets [$8].
roginager calls [$8].
asafbaron folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Js ]

AATrain01 checks.

roginager bets [$15].
AATrain01 calls [$15].
** Dealing River ** [ 9h ]
AATrain01 checks.
roginager bets [$35].
AATrain01 folds.

My plan was to c/c a safe river, but the flush completed and villain didn't show any signs of slowing down.

I like it. every draw got there on the river and you could have been behind before the river. Unless he was just totally floating you the only things you beat are 9T/89 and I don't think he bets a showdownable hand like that on the river unless he thinks he's bluffing the best hand which isn't often.

Could a blocking bet work here on the river? Chances are he may also be afraid of whatever draw came in will only raise with the nuts. I can imagine even a $10 bet here will do its job most of the time.

nh. I think a blocking bet here on the river is bad, because he lead the turn when the 2nd J fell, and because so many draws got here on the river

No need to see a showdown to know you are beat. Good fold