|
|
 KQo against a super-loose passive table
This was my second hand at this table, and I could tell from the stats on the table from the PokerStars Lobby that this was a table full of super-loose passives. The previous hand also contained nearly every player at the table with four of them going to showdown with crap.
PokerStars 0.10/0.20 Hold'em (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with K , Q .
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, 2 folds, MP2 calls, Hero raises, CO calls, Button calls, SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP2 calls.
Flop: (16 SB) A , 2, 6 (8 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero checks, CO checks, Button bets, SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP2 folds, Hero calls, CO calls.
Turn: (11.50 BB) J (7 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero checks, CO checks, Button checks.
River: (11.50 BB) K (7 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG folds, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets, CO folds, Button calls, SB calls, BB folds, UTG+1 folds.
Final Pot: 14.50 BB
Results in white below:
SB has 9d Qh (high card, ace).
Hero has Kd Qc (one pair, kings).
Button has 5h 6s (one pair, sixes).
Outcome: Hero wins 14.50 BB.
Was my line optimal? The complete passivity the entire table had after an ace on the flop appeared convinced me that no one had an ace, and that seeing the turn was a must in this big pot with two overcards that may still be good.
Nevertheless, this was an interesting table to play at. Too bad people busted out really quick and half the table left after about 10 hands. I did manage to extract one more good-sized pot though before the table was replaced with tight players and was no longer worth my time.
|
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
