|
Hiding aces
My general read on UTG was slightly maniac, read on MP was a bit fishy. Not terribly trustable as far as reads go, I'm new at this.
(BLINDS $0.01/$0.02) NO LIMIT TEXAS HOLD'EM
9 handed table - all pre-flop folds removed for clarity - there were no additional limpers
Seat 3: Hero -CO ($6.35 in chips)
Seat 7: UTG ($1.88 in chips)
Seat 9: MP ($2.35 in chips)
Dealt to Hero :Ah: :Ac:
UTG: Call ($0.02)
MP : Call ($0.02)
Hero : Raise ($0.08)
UTG: Call ($0.06)
MP : Call ($0.06)
*** FLOP *** : :Ad: :Qs: 
UTG: Bet ($0.02)
MP : Call ($0.02)
Hero : Raise ($0.04)
UTG: Call ($0.02)
MP : Call ($0.02)
*** TURN *** : :Ad: :Qs: 
UTG: Bet ($0.08)
MP : Call ($0.08)
Hero : Call ($0.08)
*** RIVER *** : :Ad: :Qs: 
UTG: Bet ($0.08)
MP : Fold
Hero : Raise ($1.80)
UTG: Call All-in ($1.60)
*** SUMMARY ***
Pot: $3.81 | Rake: $0.20
Results in grey:
Hero bet $2, collected $3.93, net +$1.93 (showed hand) [ Ah Ac ] (three of a kind, aces)
UTG lost $1.88 (showed hand) [ Qh 5d ] (a pair of queens)
So for this hand, hiding behind UTG's bet ended well, as it seems they thought my huge river raise was a bluff and MP got sucked out for more cash then if I would have raised the flop or river in any serious way, I think. Question is, do y'all think this was a good play or a poor play that just happened to work out once?
|