Quote Originally Posted by Pelion
No im talking about the situation where in some cases, it might be unconstitutional to ban certain types of child porn. In these cases you can change the constitution to strictly forbid it without having the chance of hurting any of the 'good guys'.

I completely take your point about searches though. Thats the same argument that has (and should IMO) be used against the new 'anti terrorism' laws that have been passed in both the US and UK allowing people to be searched or inprisioned at random and indefinatly without charge or any type of trial. These laws clearly are open to abuse and should not be allowed to exist.
Alright, then it looks like we are in agreement, I guess we were arguing two different things here. If your argument is that certain types of child porn are legal because the people arent actually underaged but are portrayed as so and that the courts should rule that illegal, then I agree with you there. The laws are what should be changed to affect that, and the courts should interpret the constitution as such.