25NL FR - TPTK on turn vs Aggressive player

[Gobbatino]

That's very high AFq for someone with 49/18. I'm calling down, happy about it or shoveling works too. This will be AA,KK sometimes, but mostly KQ, QJ, JJ plus any number of flush draws IMO.

Hand 0: 42.562% 42.56% 00.00% 824 0.00 { TT+, 22, AsKs, KcQc, KdQd, KhQh, KcJc, KdJd, QJs, AKo, KQo }
Hand 1: 57.438% 57.44% 00.00% 1112 0.00 { AhQc }

[rpm]

That's very high AFq for someone with 49/18.

hello. i don't know what you mean by this. why should his preflop play (vpip/pfr) be relative to his aggressiveness/passivity postflop?
also the turn cbet stats are probably pretty irrelevant over only 100ish hands in my opinion. because turn cbets need 2 things to happen prior, they require a pretty large sample. although i'd take a note that he did this and see if you can spot a pattern for what hands he does this robot auto-pot line.

[Gobbatino]

hello. i don't know what you mean by this. why should his preflop play (vpip/pfr) be relative to his aggressiveness/passivity postflop?
also the turn cbet stats are probably pretty irrelevant over only 100ish hands in my opinion. because turn cbets need 2 things to happen prior, they require a pretty large sample. although i'd take a note that he did this and see if you can spot a pattern for what hands he does this robot auto-pot line.

If someone plays only a very tight range, they will be betting a high percent of their flops and turns for value because they will normally have very strong holdings. If someone plays a very wide range but still bets a high amount of the flops and fires 100% turns after c-betting, he will usually be betting quite lightly or bluffing a lot because his initial range is weak and is less likely to be something strong on the flop/turn.

Feel free to correct me if my logic is wrong there.