A few hands against Mr. Ike

[nutsinho]

ok good i hadnt read other responses im exactly opposite p4s. i know i got them right then

[pocketfours]

ok good i hadnt read other responses im exactly opposite p4s. i know i got them right then

We aren't exact opposite. We agree on #2, #4.

#2: I said I don't think he is bluffing (that's means I'd fold). My comment about calling and calling some more meant that I would take a passive line starting from the flop.

#4: With history I think it's fine. Against most opponents this is a very nice play but if villain is insanely good then I think he should see it for what it is. I just wanted to say that to me this doesn't look like a bluff. Does it look like a bluff to you knowing Bens game pretty well?

But we do seem to disagree about the rest:

#1: I think it is abundantly clear that we have a bluff catcher here. I also think he is raising slightly more than he would need to raise if he was bluffing which makes me think he is strong. Yeah we have a full house but there's six combos that beat us and they make PERFECT sense, especially taking into account sizing on both sides. I thought you of all people would fold here.

#3: This hand is pretty meh. I just think it's fun to fold the nut flush on this board so I fold. Do you think he shoves 7c for value?

#5: I just think it's a sick play to turn trips into a bluff in a HU match, so I think it's awesome.

#6: I think villain could shove worse top pair for value here and it can certainly be a bluff. He gets to the river like this with all sorts of garbage so I don't see much reason to fold.