06-11-2010 02:43 AM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
06-13-2010 09:55 PM
#2
| |
your 3-bet stats in the blinds should be switched | |
06-13-2010 09:59 PM
#3
| |
| |
06-14-2010 12:43 AM
#4
| |
the nature of the big blind offers lots of incentive for flatting, and the nature of the sb promotes 3-betting. I feel like I have a pretty solid preflop game and sb has always been my highest 3-bet stat, followed closely by button, then bb, then co. | |
06-14-2010 07:01 AM
#5
| |
Yah I could go either way really. My SB/BB 3bet stats are pretty much the same. | |
| |
06-15-2010 02:33 AM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
thx guys |
06-15-2010 03:38 AM
#7
| |
I don't think 72% f3b is very high really. Don't know how the "4b range" stat works, but for 4bet bluffing I prefer something with blockers, preferably suited ie weakish broadways and Qxs+. | |
06-15-2010 07:09 AM
#8
| |
Just because you value bet, doesn't mean you need to value bet 1/2 pot or greater. You know you're ahead based on the line, but you have a very marginal hand, bet like 1/10th of the pot. Let him tilt call A high cause draws bricked, or c/r bluff you when it makes zero zero sense for a c/r. | |
| |
06-15-2010 10:45 AM
#9
| |
That stat takes forever to converge, and preflop dynamics can be very well established before that point. We'll usually know whether or not someone is likely to get it in lighter vs us much faster by basic observation i.e villain shoved over 4bet CO vs BTN with AJs etc etc | |