Just got back from seeing it in iMAX. Incredible movie imo. Great acting, awesome story, beautiful cinematography.
Thoughts?
07-19-2010 11:41 PM
#1
| |
| |
Last edited by a500lbgorilla; 07-24-2010 at 03:54 PM. | |
07-20-2010 12:00 AM
#2
| |
It was good, I'm seeing it again Wednesday. | |
07-20-2010 12:02 AM
#3
| |
I have something for you to look for but I don't wanna spoil... | |
07-20-2010 12:29 AM
#4
| |
How much better do you think it'd be in iMAX as opposed to regular? I is poor but the special effects seem pretty cool. | |
07-20-2010 12:30 AM
#5
| |
don't need iMAX imo, save your $4 | |
07-20-2010 12:36 AM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
in b4 peneny |
07-20-2010 12:36 AM
#7
| |
my GF saw this movie without telling me | |
07-20-2010 12:36 AM
#8
| |
07-20-2010 04:16 AM
#9
| |
| |
07-20-2010 10:27 AM
#10
| |
Yeah I want to see this too. | |
07-20-2010 10:44 AM
#11
| |
sucks that a screener hasn't been leaked yet | |
07-20-2010 10:49 AM
#12
| |
07-20-2010 10:51 AM
#13
| |
Awesome awesome movie. Would have been interesting to see it in imax 3d but even a normal theater was sick. | |
| |
07-20-2010 11:41 AM
#14
| |
yea it was definitely one of the best movies i've seen in a long time. | |
07-20-2010 07:11 PM
#15
| |
I'm going to see it tomorrow, however my issue with Leo movies is that he has a hard time living through them | |
| |
07-21-2010 01:33 AM
#16
| |
Can we please allow this thread to include spoilers? I'd like to discuss this movie without people bitching. | |
| |
07-21-2010 01:39 AM
#17
| |
Gonna watch it again...was amazing first time around. | |
07-21-2010 01:43 AM
#18
| |
Please don't tell me I was the only one that disliked it. Wufwugy? Please? | |
| |
07-21-2010 01:47 AM
#19
| |
07-21-2010 01:51 AM
#20
| |
I understood the entire movie and can explain anything in the movie. Every single part. Just because a movie is complicated, makes you think, and has a weak twist doesn't make it good. | |
| |
07-21-2010 07:28 AM
#21
| |
I don't know how I feel about the movie. It was an awesomely constructed world which was wholly engrossing and I would certainly like to see it for the first time again but I understand what you're saying. | |
| |
07-24-2010 02:38 PM
#22
| |
*********ANYTHING POSTED BELOW THIS POST IS POTENTIALLY A SPOILER.********** | |
07-24-2010 03:46 PM
#23
| |
My biggest question was always about how he got to limbo at the end, was it b/c he was stabbed by his wife in the 3rd level or drowned in the van in the water in the 1st level? The fact that he washed up on the beach makes me think the latter. | |
07-25-2010 02:05 PM
#24
| |
| |
07-25-2010 02:10 PM
#25
| |
i think it was drowning in the van as well. | |
Last edited by fulksy; 07-25-2010 at 02:34 PM. | |
07-25-2010 02:48 PM
#26
| |
boog can explain it to us | |
07-25-2010 03:00 PM
#27
| |
I need to see it again b/c I'm sure I'm forgetting stuff or the thoughts I had | |
07-25-2010 08:32 PM
#28
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Guys, am I right in thinking that because Limbo is a shared state described generally as subconscious unconstructed nothingness Saito, the mark and Ariadne went into Cobb's limbo (which happened to be constructed) as they had all been in dreams where Cobb was the host/architect? So therefore whilst if someone slipped into their own limbo, they would have no means to kill themselves as it was nothingness, in Cobb's constructed limbo they had the means to kill themselves? This would make sense as Saito and Cobb had shared a construction of Saito's office at the beginning. |
| |
07-25-2010 10:23 PM
#29
| |
This seems like the only plausible answer, and I really have no issues with it except that it just wasnt really made clear at all. But yes, Saito and the mark could have both been essentially in purgatory until Cobb went down into limbo, bringing along with him his preconstructed limbo. | |
07-25-2010 10:30 PM
#30
| |
In the snow level both Cobb and Ariadne used the sedative pack thing to drop into limbo. | |
07-26-2010 12:51 AM
#31
| |
07-26-2010 10:54 AM
#32
| |
Saito entered limbo way before any of the other guys. They get old quickly down there. | |
Last edited by BooG690; 07-26-2010 at 11:10 AM.
| |
07-26-2010 12:00 PM
#33
| |
i think the top countinued to spin, because when he saw his children they were exactly the same as in his memory. i assume he was gone for quite a while and his children had not aged at all, they were wearing the same clothes and in the same spot as his previous memory. | |
07-26-2010 12:52 PM
#34
| |
| |
07-26-2010 12:59 PM
#35
| |
I think the top fell.. it was just a fun taunt to the audience at the end to not actually show it fall. Also, how would you show it falling? It seems that either the camera shoots back to it and its already laying on its side, or you dont show it. If you show it still spinning for a while AND show it fall.. idk.. thats just lame. | |
07-26-2010 01:03 PM
#36
| |
As for Saito entering limbo way before the others... I dont think so. If 10 minutes had passed in the real world, or even in the first level, that should be long enough to age him like that. But 10.. at most 20 minutes elapsed in the snow level, which should only be days or weeks.. maybe months, but not years and certainly not decades when you go only one level down. | |
07-26-2010 01:13 PM
#37
| |
Remember, wounds get BETTER as you go up levels. If he died in the snow level, I'm sure he croaked up in the van. | |
| |
07-26-2010 01:16 PM
#38
| |
it doesn't matter if the top fell or not guys, when he sees his kids faces he has accepted the world he is in to be his reality | |
07-26-2010 01:19 PM
#39
| |
Right, that's obviously the point... | |
| |
07-26-2010 01:19 PM
#40
| |
| |
07-26-2010 01:22 PM
#41
| |
I like the assumption. And I apologize for not differentiating my directions. :P | |
| |
07-26-2010 01:23 PM
#42
| |
About the top at the end, it was definitely wobbling which was something it never did in the dreams. I would have liked more explanation of what the other "super company" was that kept being referenced. Like in the beginning when saito finds cobb there was talk of being deep in "someone's territory" what was that about? | |
| |
07-26-2010 01:25 PM
#43
| |
| |
07-26-2010 01:28 PM
#44
| |
| |
07-26-2010 01:28 PM
#45
| |
| |
07-26-2010 02:16 PM
#46
| |
The spinning top falling or not would only matter if there were more movie, but there was no more movie. | |
| |
07-26-2010 02:50 PM
#47
| |
| |
07-26-2010 03:15 PM
#48
| |
| |
07-26-2010 06:11 PM
#49
| |
07-26-2010 09:49 PM
#50
| |
| |
07-27-2010 05:05 PM
#51
| |
| |
07-27-2010 06:16 PM
#52
| |
I thought it was laugh out loud funny here: http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...ml#post1959169 | |
| |
07-27-2010 06:19 PM
#53
| |
there were probably 4-5 rofl lines during the movie, Nolan likes to throw in some funny stuff and it catches you completely off guard | |
07-27-2010 11:41 PM
#54
| |
| |
07-28-2010 12:47 AM
#55
| |
ok that one got me pretty good | |
07-28-2010 04:24 PM
#56
| |
YouTube - Inception Music Comparison | |
07-28-2010 04:30 PM
#57
| |
| |
07-28-2010 05:14 PM
#58
| |
ya, thats pretty awesome indeed. | |
07-28-2010 11:04 PM
#59
| |
![]() ![]()
|
wow, it's stuff like that i fucking love about music and art in general |
07-30-2010 09:56 AM
#60
| |
this interpretation seems wholly plausible to me: | |
08-01-2010 08:21 PM
#61
| |
Didn't everyone need his or her own token? If so, how in the hell does Leonardo's character end up with Mol's token, the spinning thing that never stops spinning when it's a dream? Unless the whole thing (movie) was an nth (limbo) level dream in the first place, it does not compute. | |
| |
08-01-2010 08:23 PM
#62
| |
08-01-2010 08:24 PM
#63
| |
But you were not allowed to touch other's tokens ever; wasn't that one of the first tests he cooked up for Ariadne? | |
Last edited by Jack Sawyer; 08-01-2010 at 08:29 PM.
| |
08-01-2010 10:16 PM
#64
| |
| |
Last edited by oomike01; 08-01-2010 at 10:20 PM. | |
08-02-2010 03:56 AM
#65
| |
08-08-2010 11:01 PM
#66
| |
Another interesting theory...it's ALL a dream | |
| |
08-08-2010 11:08 PM
#67
| |
We spoke about this with the top not falling at the end of the movie. | |
| |
08-08-2010 11:19 PM
#68
| |
Did you read it? According to this it's ALL a dream. This has nothing to do with the top at the end. | |
| |
08-08-2010 11:22 PM
#69
| |
The purpose of the totems was to allow the dreamers to determine if they were in a dream at the present time or in reality. Example: Arthur's totem was a loaded die. We can assume that when rolled in the real world, it would roll the same number every time. Say that Arthur entered Cobb's dream. Well Cobb knew Arthur had a loaded die, but he didn't know which number it was loaded to. So if Arthur was in Cobb's dream, we can assume that the loaded die would behave like a normal die. This would allow Arthur to determine if he was in a dream by rolling the die. If Cobb got his hands on the die in the real world, then Arthur would have to find a new totem. | |
08-09-2010 04:27 AM
#70
| |
08-09-2010 08:33 AM
#71
| |
My only theory on this is that people are more aware that they are in a dream when it is there own. When Cobb and Ariadne are in a dream for the first time, Cobb tells Ariadne to not build dreams from real places. It seems that if you avoid doing this, you'll be aware that you're in your own dream. | |
08-09-2010 02:00 PM
#72
| |
08-10-2010 03:36 PM
#73
| |
Just went and watched this high the other night. Mind exploded many many times. BooG is a confirmed Nazi/Commie bastard. | |
08-11-2010 11:27 AM
#74
| |
even though you're right, boog, in the sense that this article doesn't add that much to the plot explanation ('cause we already addressed the theory that the whole movie is a dream), this article is a must read as it's a very good thematic interpretation. | |
08-21-2010 10:09 AM
#75
| |
| |