|
|
 Originally Posted by Lyric
Let's define the word wealth. According to dictionary.com it is:
a. all things that have exchange value.
b. anything that has utility and is capable of being exchanged.
This is a good definition and is in line with my previous assertion that wealth is anything that humans value. Wealth is not an abundance of free time per se. We value free time but it is only one type of "thing that has utility." We must stick with an economics definition to continue a meaningful discussion.
fine, we will stick with it. Do you see why you just made it far easier to prove that wealth is impossible with only one man?
|