|
|
 Originally Posted by DoubleJ
Which ones please, Nak?
I think my HUD layout may be something like this.
VPIP / PFR / # BB / Hands
C-bet / Fold to C-bet / 3-bet / Fold to 3-bet
Steal att / Call steal in BB / Call steal in SB
I like to split the last two calling stats into BB and SB because most people tend to have a preference to call much wider in the BB than the SB.
I think this is pretty much everything I need to make a good decision. While I definitely think there is something to be said for too much information in the HUD, sometimes just having a 3-bet % available can make a difference in a tight hand. I even recently made a beautiful HUD for HUSNGs and stopped using it because I found it hampered my game. If you stare long enough at the numbers, you eventually seem to find ways to justify poor play.
If I can get it to work, I might try adding live tracking for PS. I have noticed that M or # BB is updated before the hand finishes if you have live tracking switched on. What I'm looking for is adding the player actions to the HUD. So it would go like LC-XC- etc. Since I'm not looking at every table all the time, it would be useful to know whether I was the PFR or if I just called PF. Sometimes I end up checking hands I should bet because I forget I was the aggressor PF.
Taipan's old school btw and only uses the very general stats. In a way he is correct because 3-bet % etc. take a long time to converge on the 'real' figure. In my game I often sit down at tables where I have over 1k of hands on an opponent, so having some of these figures is very useful in decisions involving these guys. I wouldn't bother including most of these stats if I was playing randoms mostly.
|