You'd vary your bet sizing (by a huge, noticeable amount) depending on the strength of your hand rather than basing your bet sizing on the
board texture and
villain's ranges? Seems kind of transparent.
I prefer to vary my ranges to match bet sizing, which is more concealed. When I vary my bet sizing, it's only by a couple of BB's.
Seems like a combination of the 2 tactics would be ideal. I.e. having multiple bet-sizes on a specific
board texture and appropriate ranges to fill each bet-sizing. By "appropriate", I mean non-transparent strength.
What % of the time will a
donk bet take it down?
What % of the time will either IP
villain bet when checked to?
What % of the time will a c/r
take it down?
Feels like you are quite confident that 77 is the best hand, but will it stay the best hand? If not, will any
bet size deter someone from calling to take another card? What is the EV if you
open donk-jammed?
In a 4-
handed pot, seeing a
turn card is highly likely. So while you're "betting for protection", is your bet actually offering you protection?
Maybe I'
m just a bit weak in these spots, but 77 seems like a weak
showdown hand akin to having A6 in this
spot (which I'd actually prefer, giving me 5
outs to
improve instead of just 2.)