I Raised then I betted then this happened.

[surviva316]

This seems to make your c/c'ing range pretty damned exploitable (I struggle to think of combos we'd have that would be better than A-high). Then again, this is probably perfectly exploitative play at these stakes because our perceived range is probably mostly going to be weak pairs because the best bluffing cards are gonna totally monkey fuck our range.

So yeah, I think I like c/c'ing our elite broadway combos+probably like 76s, and just c/r 87s+ and anything else we want to continue with.

[Carroters]

This seems to make your c/c'ing range pretty damned exploitable (I struggle to think of combos we'd have that would be better than A-high). Then again, this is probably perfectly exploitative play at these stakes because our perceived range is probably mostly going to be weak pairs because the best bluffing cards are gonna totally monkey fuck our range.

So yeah, I think I like c/c'ing our elite broadway combos+probably like 76s, and just c/r 87s+ and anything else we want to continue with.

Yeah it does make our c/c range super unbalanced, but I don't think I care about that since almost all regs will not have any idea this is the case for a long time and might be playing well vs our perceived range but not our actual range in spots where we c/c or c/r. Of course there will come a point where we need to change our strategy if we showdown a c/r'ed 99 etc, but until then let's just be mega exploitable in these games IMO. It's pretty nice that we're c/r lots of our perceived c/c hands. Good broadways with bdfds are actually better hands to c/c the flop with than something like 44-66 and arguably even 88 I think.

We only need to be unexploitable when our base assumptions lead us to think we are likely to be exploited right?

Be interested to here what M2m thinks of this strategy.