Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

QQ overpair on twotone board vs nit

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,441
    Location
    IRC, Come join me!
    Bluffing 60 combos is absurd no matter what you are betting. If you are splitting your betting range(assuming you have different sizes) that means you should have 2 different bluffing frequencies for both different bet size.
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...-a-153854.html

    Join IRC. Now.

    <Cobra> Nobody folds an A BvB, that's absurd
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
    If you are splitting your betting range that means you should have 2 different bluffing frequencies for both different bet size.
    Is this in general what splitting a range refers to?
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
    Bluffing 60 combos is absurd no matter what you are betting.
    This is what I was inclined to think, which is why I was so uncertain of my conclusions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
    If you are splitting your betting range(assuming you have different sizes) that means you should have 2 different bluffing frequencies for both different bet size.
    Yeah, my conclusion was based on the assumption that we have no sizing or timing tells whatsoever. Maybe just the mere fact that we'll bet 2/3+ PSB with part of our range and bet 1/2- PSB with another part of our range is enough to resolve the issue right there. This really is a spot where you have some invulnerable hands that might bet smaller and have some thin vbet hands that might also bet smaller for vbet-ish/protection-ish, so the assumption is especially impractical here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •