|
|
 Originally Posted by daven
< 200 hands on villain so i'm asking for people's thoughts on turn and river = implicit in that is their thoughts on villain's range. Basically want people's thoughts on what he can have left once we get to the river and what % of that range i beat.
The reason this bothers me (and I'm not claiming to be right) is that "they" have 0 info about Villain other than what's in OP. So by omitting that information and encouraging speculation, you get terse advice, based on unnamed assumptions about what "they" have guessed.
E.g. caddie444 and BorisTheSpider gave you an answer, but no rationale. At best you can learn to mimic their play in this spot, but you can't learn what motivated their line and evaluate its merits against other lines. (OK, maybe you can, but I can't.)
To me, this kind of reply is about as helpful as a pat on the back. It buoys my confidence, but doesn't prepare me for the future. I can't fault them for an unjustified answer, as your question just begs unjustified answers.
Even a vague comment about Villain's assumed strengths/leaks is good info. After 168 hands, you must've seen Villain do 1 or 2 things OTT or OTR that caught your attention. Those bits of information are hugely important to how I play my game, and what lines I will take. It's not like there's any reason to assume the villains I'm facing on Bovada are playing the same as the villains you're playing. Even if they were, there is enough variation in post flop play styles and leaks, that I don't think a broad generalization helps too much.
In lieu of the relevant info, I feel like I'd need to leave a wall of text to cover the possibilities and why should I bother to put in that effort if the OP didn't? (I mean look at the length of my posts, as it is... if I tried to cover multiple contingencies, they'd be much longer)
|
Reply With Quote