Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumSmall Stakes NL Hold'em

Cooler of the year?

Results 1 to 36 of 36

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    If I concluded as villain that hero's range is AA, I wouldn't fold because quite frankly it's ridiculous to give someone a range that is one combo large. I think it's fair to say that A4 can take hero's line too because it flops the nuts and is only losing to A6 and AQ by river, while beating 44 66 QQ and any Ax that villain is overplaying. If hero shoves this river with A4 and gets called by boats only, it's +ev because there's 1x 44, 6x 66, 6x QQ (=13) vs 3x AQ, 3x A6 (=6). In fact we're only losing river rake if he only calls QQ AQ A6, if my combo counting is correct, so we'd only need one call from worse than QQ some stupidly small % of the time to move into clear profit territory.

    So yeah I'm folding river as villain if I am on top of my game, because I think hero's range is A4 and AA (=7 combos), and very very occasionaly he's gonna show up with 44 A6 and 66, but they all cancel each other out anyway.

    But I can easily make this call too because it takes skill and discipline to make this fold, and those two aspects rarely click into place for me.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  2. #2
    LOL for a hand I initially though was kind of uninteresting, this has actually turned out to be a very worthwhile discussion.

    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    If I concluded as villain that hero's range is AA, I wouldn't fold because quite frankly it's ridiculous to give someone a range that is one combo large.
    Although I can see what you mean in one sense (and I do sometimes have MUBS and concentrate on small parts of peoples ranges that I don't want to run into), I don't think this is necessarily a valid way to look at it. Sometimes, if someones range literally is one (or very few combos) folding is absolutely OK.

    For example, a 10/7 opens UTG, he folds to 80% of 3bets and his 4bet range is 1%. You 3bet him with AA, he flats. Flop is K72r, he checks, you pot it and he jams for another 150bb. You calling?

    Same player opens UTG, you 3bet on the button, the BB cold 4bets and the nit UTG jams it in. Happy about your kings now?

    So although I think it's rare, sometimes I do think you can fold even when someones range seems ridiculously narrow. I know it's not quite the 1-combo range we were talking about, but it's not far off.

    I think it's fair to say that A4 can take hero's line too because it flops the nuts and is only losing to A6 and AQ by river
    Yeah, I agree up to a point. I think A4 can play exactly like this right up until the river jam. I think I'd just flat his river raise normally with A4, unless I was very confident he could overplay a bare ace or smaller boat. Maybe that's a mistake, but I think I'd often just call the river raise there.

    Your analysis of why jamming A4 is +EV if he calls with all the boats is interesting. I get a slightly different result, A6s is only possible for villain on this board when we hold A4s if we have Ac4c, then he can have Ad6d, otherwise if we have Ad4d, Ac6c is blocked by the 6 on the board being the 6c. In this situation, I have QQ being 43% of his range, so we lose to 57%, and that assumes he always raises the river and calls a jam with queens full.

    Holding A6 is the opposite, we win 57% if he calls a jam with all the aces full combos and QQ.

    I agree that it's somewhat unlikely for A6 to check back the flop, but I certainly feel like I can check the flop back here at least somewhat often with A6 - the board, other than the heart draw, is dry. I'm not as worried about the heart draw as I am about building a big pot with a dominated ace here, and if I get called by worse I'm almost never getting 3 streets anyway, so I probably quite often check back the flop for pot control and deception. If the flush turns or rivers and I'm unimproved, I'll deal with that when I come to it - for now, I'm more concerned that betting the flop is way too thin and if called I'm out of position for the rest of the hand with a low(er) SPR, very deep stacks, a flush draw out there and a hand that's too good to c/f and too bad to be happy about shovelling in money with.


    But I can easily make this call too because it takes skill and discipline to make this fold, and those two aspects rarely click into place for me.
    Having thought this hand through, I actually think I do raise-fold QQ. I originally posted indicating I didn't think he could fold, because I make a lot of bad hero folds myself, so I have to work on that - however this probably isn't a bad spot for one, and in-game I really doubt I call it off with QQ on the river here. I doubt I could ever fold A4 here, but that's very marginal as we've established and doesn't seem to matter much either way.
  3. #3
    Even if hero only has A4s and AA (which is what I'd assume as villain), then that's 3x more likely to happen than AA alone.

    Folding a boat to a range of 3 combos is pretty sick in its own right, but it would also be pretty sick for hero to have worse than QQ here. I think the point I'm making is I'd expect the probability of hero being full of shit here is roughly about as often as him having AA. I'd only need to conclude it's a bluff a non-zero % and it's a call, if hero reps AA only.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  4. #4
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    If I concluded as villain that hero's range is AA, I wouldn't fold because quite frankly it's ridiculous to give someone a range that is one combo large. I think it's fair to say that A4 can take hero's line too because it flops the nuts and is only losing to A6 and AQ by river, while beating 44 66 QQ and any Ax that villain is overplaying. If hero shoves this river with A4 and gets called by boats only, it's +ev because there's 1x 44, 6x 66, 6x QQ (=13) vs 3x AQ, 3x A6 (=6). In fact we're only losing river rake if he only calls QQ AQ A6, if my combo counting is correct, so we'd only need one call from worse than QQ some stupidly small % of the time to move into clear profit territory.

    So yeah I'm folding river as villain if I am on top of my game, because I think hero's range is A4 and AA (=7 combos), and very very occasionaly he's gonna show up with 44 A6 and 66, but they all cancel each other out anyway.

    But I can easily make this call too because it takes skill and discipline to make this fold, and those two aspects rarely click into place for me.
    It isn't crazy to give someone a range only 1 combo large when the hand involves a player stacking off 300bb deep, with most of that coming on the river with a seemingly reasonable hero b/3b shoving into a very possible boat.

    Your analysis shows the flaws of using unweighted ranges. 6 combos of A4 and 1 combo of AA sounds good but in reality I'd expect hero to nearly always 3-bet preflop with AA and almost never 3-bet with any given combo of A4 (usually folding A4o and calling the 2 combos of A4s) which makes AA far more likely than A4 given preflop action alone.
    Last edited by Lukie; 11-20-2013 at 09:34 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •