This is similar to the previous hand. I would have set A/ 3
/ T
9
8
. 1st draw play A
top and 5
mid. 2nd draw play 9
low and 4
mid (lamenting playing the 5 instead of the 4 mid first draw, but the 5 was more live at the time). 3rd draw play 3
mid and 8
low. 4th draw play 5
mid and K
on top, making FL.
You finish with
AA
K
35
4
3
5
![]()
T9
8
9
8
Again, the idea behind both hands is to get FL cards to the top on the set. I know a strong case can be made for setting xxx / A3
/ T
9
8
instead, and I think that's fine too (although as the cards fell it would not have made FL). I know I love AA on top a little too much and that sometimes gets me in trouble. But in both of these 2 hands I'd say don't fall in love with 3-flushes to the point that you give away the value of FL cards.






















4
7













6
Reply With Quote

