Is Global Warming a Hoax?

[Keith]

The fact that this is the response to what Keith said is the mountain that scientists have to climb and why many scientists don't see the point in talking about their fields with laymen who don't have any true ambition to understand what the scientists have done or what the results mean.

If you don't understand the data, that's one thing. If you assert that your lack of understanding means the conclusions are false, then that's a non-sequitur until you can demonstrate that the data is at fault, and not your understanding of the data.

with an B.Sc (Hons) in Agricultural science ,I would think that I am not the layman that you seem to think i am with regards CO2 production by agriculture. Hence the fact that i picked on that part of the figures because its part that i can make informed comment on.

You may find this link interesting http://www.rdmag.com/article/2016/11...e-growth-rates and demonstrates the well known fact that increased co2 increases plant growth rate until other nutrients become the limiting factor that is widely used in greenhouses where local environmental co2 levels can be increased cheaply without losing the co2 to the wider atmosphere.

edit: shit , just told Ong how to make his weed production more efficient.