|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
I guess you missed the part I said about foreign trade being a different type of business than building hotels. Foreign trade is not about self-promotion and stiffing contractors and fake universities
Seriously? How can you not look at the man's business success, worldwide, and at least have a little respect. Lots of companies build hotels. None of them have anyone as wealthy and successful as Donald Trump working there. Just admit, the guy is fucking great at business.
I'm not saying he's an angel, but there are definitely two sides to the story on stiffing contractors and T-University. Besides, do you know any great cornerbacks who have never been flagged for pass interference? Ever heard a basketball player say "if you're not foulin' you're not tryin'"? Did you know, 'rubbin is racin'?
Trump is far from an arch-criminal.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
These aren't gullible fools you're dealing with, and they're not going to be bullied into doing things against their country's interests..
Funny, I feel like that's exactly what the rest of the world did to Obama.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Lol ad hominen..
But apt. The point is, it's not easy to get from wherever he started to where he is. Whether he started with a million, ten milllion or half a billion, he's still a tremendous success, even without getting elected president of the United States.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
It's more than the time it takes him to type the words with his tiny fingers. It's the fact that he's sitting around watching everything that's being said about him. He's watching all the news shows, all the SNL skits.
I'm sure every president, going all the way back Washington, has paid attention to media coverage. So what? Why does that bother you? So what if he spends twenty seconds out of his weekend to challenge a report on crowd size? Why is that even news?
It's news because a hostile media decided that it's news. They decided that this was concrete evidence delusion and an inability to comprehend facts. He's an old man with an ego who doesn't like being insulted. And when he can take three seconds to respond to an attack, he does it. This isn't news. Everyone has known this about Trump for two years now, and HE STILL WON.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Get a fucking perspective on what matters and stop crying over getting a rough ride in the media.
The media coverage of the POTUS definitely matters. It affects his perception to voters, it affects the party's perception to voters, it affects the perception to other countries. It definitely matters. It definitely hurt George W's ability to lead, and it definitely helped cover many of Obama's failings.
You can't deny that the media coverage of politics is a completely different animal after this election. The game has changed. And it's obvious the President needs a defense mechanism to keep salacious and spun-up stories from being propagated as facts.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
And he doesn't just tweet to cry over shit. The other day Fox News said the feds should go in and clean up Chicago. Half an hour later he tweets about sending in the feds. Is that really the kind of guy you want running things?
I don't get what you mean?
First of all, you must not watch much Fox News. They've been yelling at Emmanuel to call in the National Guard for a long time now. That narrative has been out there. It's an option that's always been on the table. Just because Trump seized on it as a potential solution doesn't mean he's a media puppet. It means he sees a problem, is genuinely concerned, and promises action.
In other words, he's doing the job of the president of the united states. Sheesh.
That being said, it is obvious that Bill O'Reilly has Trump's ear on some things. But to tell you the truth, I think that's great.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
You mean like how he tried to de-legitimize Obama with all that birther shit? Awww, I feel so bad for him.
First of all, the "you started it" game, is for fifth graders. Secondly, if Obama wants to be resentful, he can be. How is that NBC and CNN are the 'enforcers' here? Third, Trump started the birther stuff as one man, a private citizen. That's WAY different than a coordinated agenda by a supposedly ethical and impartial media. And fourth, when he was proven wrong, he backed off, and admitted publicly that he was wrong. That doesn't sound like the delusional tantrum-thrower the media is trying to create now.
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
The reason the media is hard on Trump is T R U M P. There's no-one else to blame; it's really that simple. If he started acting like a decent, grown-up person he would stop getting all the bad press.
Zoom out a little more. The only way Trump could get elected was to do and say things exactly as he did throughout the campaign. He manipulated the media coverage during the primary by purposefully saying crazy stuff, to keep the attention on him. Rather than admit that they were being played, the media has chosen to strike back in viciously personal ways.
I mean, during the campaign Trump said "I want to ban all Muslim immigration". A student in an 8th grade civics class could give you 20 different reasons why that would be unconstitutional/illegal. Do you really think Trump didn't know this? Do you really think that he believes such an order could become law? Do you really believe that as successful as he's been, that he's THAT stupid???
That's how the media played it. "this guy doesn't even know the first amendment, how can he be president???"
It's been proven now that those statements were merely the openings for negotiations. That's obvious in light of the fact that Trump's actual order was to shut down immigration from just 6 countries, for a mere 30 days. Given how that played out, you'd think that the media would be open to the wall being paid through a renegotiation of NAFTA, rather than Nieto showing up in Juarez in a sombrero holding a giant novelty check.
That doesn't seem to be the case. You almost never hear the news media mention the 30-day restriction. You just hear "trump slams the door on muslims". The other day I saw a CAIR spokesperson on TV being asked about this order. He said "Well this is obviously just the first of many anti-muslim acts to come from this administration" or something like that. In other words, he's protesting his own hypothesis. That's the sin the media is committing. They're taking the 'extreme what-if', and making it today's news.
|