|
|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
I didn't say hungry, I said can't eat. If you can't eat, yeah, you have a significant to whole inability to work, earn, etc.. But that doesn't matter.
Explain what you mean by "can't eat". Exactly what affliction are you referring to? And it DOES matter because you're forcing a completely un-apt analogy. We're talking about access to a fair market place. Education provides that, food doesn't. What are you missing here?
Here's what matters: the assumption in your point is that the food is already available. Okay, why is it available? The private sector has made it available. Since this is the case, does it work for education?
It's a question of risk. The private sector providing food is not as much of a risk since the government is equipped to take emergency measures in cases where the private sector fails. That's what FEMA does when there is a hurricane.
If a private school fails.....what's the government's play then? How does the government fulfill it's responsibility to offer everyone fair access?
|
Reply With Quote