Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Christianity could be a higher order way of organizing lives

Results 1 to 75 of 268

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop
    Historically, they only seem to cave on things when the evidence is overwhelming and generally can't be argued against any more.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMM
    This describes science, too.
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    But with science, the beliefs being replaced are also based on evidence. It's not like Newton pulled the theory of gravity out of his ass, the way the Bible's theories of many things are.
    What?
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    What?
    I just gave an example of a theory based on evidence (Newton), being replaced by a theory that better explained anomalies in that evidence (Einstein). What do you object to about that argument?

    If you can show there was a scientific theory that was based on just whatever storybook the scientist read the previous night, and everyone blindly accepted that theory until it was overwhelmingly proven false, then please do.
  3. #3
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    I just gave an example of a theory based on evidence (Newton), being replaced by a theory that better explained anomalies in that evidence (Einstein). What do you object to about that argument?
    Nothing. Check the underscores in those quotes I quoted.

    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    If you can show there was a scientific theory that was based on just whatever storybook the scientist read the previous night, and everyone blindly accepted that theory until it was overwhelmingly proven false, then please do.
    Wait... isn't that your whole profession up to about 20 years ago?


    You're gonna have to pin that down, 'cause "the scientist" could cover a toddler jumping in puddles, experimenting on the concept of wetness.


    After a brief google search, I couldn't find any direct evidence to corroborate the tales I was told in school, not even the dates of the "era of armchair philosophers," I was told about, so I got nothing.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    Wait... isn't that your whole profession up to about 150 years ago?
    fyp. Modern psychology was born before Freud was around. Around about the time Broca met Tan.

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...ed-psychology/
  5. #5
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    fyp. Modern psychology was born before Freud was around. Around about the time Broca met Tan.

    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...ed-psychology/
    A) This means jk.
    B) Damn that article's amazing. When they started talking MRI, I was lost for a second, then I was amazed. They still have the brains? And they're still fully intact and scannable?

    I'm feeling spiritually awakened by the science!
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    They still have the brains? And they're still fully intact and scannable?

    Yup.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •