Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Capitalism Rules, Socialism and Communism Suck Thread

Results 1 to 75 of 595

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Well thank you for letting me clarify the question.

    I think it is necessary inasmuch as there are certain things that can be managed centrally that cannot be handled individually.
    By "clarify" you really mean "nullify"

    His question is about redistribution. Can you answer the question in that context?
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    His question is about redistribution. Can you answer the question in that context?
    Ah. I see you caught that.

    That IQ of yours must be at least 12. Up from 8.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    Ah. I see you caught that.

    That IQ of yours must be at least 12. Up from 8.
    you only need an IQ of 6 to catch your meaning.

    Your meaning was over Poop's head.

    You do the math.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    you only need an IQ of 6 to catch your meaning.

    Your meaning was over Poop's head.

    You do the math.
    So i give you credit for having a brain and your response is to do the opposite.

    Not a value judgment, mind you, just an observation.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    So i give you credit for having a brain and your response is to do the opposite.

    Not a value judgment, mind you, just an observation.
    You didn't "give me credit" for anything. You recognize a fact that my IQ is what it is. I'm not sure why that would preclude me from having any particular response with regard to you.

    You recognizing my clinically tested IQ does not obligate me to compliment your intelligence.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    You didn't "give me credit" for anything. You recognize a fact that my IQ is what it is. I'm not sure why that would preclude me from having any particular response with regard to you.

    You recognizing my clinically tested IQ does not obligate me to compliment your intelligence.
    I recognized it well before you made some claim to it based on a test you supposedly took once, if we are to believe you.

    I could as easily claim an IQ of 160 and it would be an equally meaningless claim.

    The point of my post was to highlight the difference between disputing an argument based on its merits and disputing an argument based on ad hominen.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •