|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
I probably agree. Lifetime business success across many fields is probably dynamic enough that ain't nobody who makes it runs good.
If we say "what does it take to become a billionaire?" or "what does it take to become the president?", those distributions are probably fat-tailed. But the situation we're dealing with is far more dynamic and complex than those questions.
I actually think sustained run good is more likely in business than poker. The difference in business is that at a certain point you have a self replenishing bankroll through diversification into passive income streams. Compounding passive income streams is the fact that if you are really big enough, you actually can become too big to fail for your creditors.
As for success across multiple industries-- One, I'd point to the failures across multiple industries, but two, and more importantly, apparent success in one industry is likely to greatly decrease the barriers of entry into other industries. The one industry I feel confident in saying Trump has been successful is that of branding, and it's also the industry whose goods have the most intangible and untethered valuations. On top of that, a brand who's branding is that of business success is going to have the most ease slipping in and out of industries.
|