Trump is the WWE and Mueller is The Undertaker

[Poopadoop]

I said ANY wager you wanna make. So fuck your mother.

How about this....

If Trump leaves office in any manner other than impeachment, you have to post a 5 minute video to YouTube where you sing "I had the time of my life" and dance with a life size cardboard cutout of Trump

Yea, see the thought of public humiliation of someone doesn't get me hard the way it gets you hard. A better reward for me would be if you started taking your angry cunt classes seriously so we could all put up with you easier. But I know you'll never agree to that.

And frankly, I don't really think he can get impeached because its too hard for the D to get 2/3 of the house and senate. They might get the house, but not enough of the senate is up for grabs to make it a good bet. And unless he actually shoots a load in Ivanka's face on live tv, the R will never vote against him because they're complete and utter pussies. So it's more of a dream than a reality.

He's still going to get spanked hard in the midterms though and become a lame-duck president for the last 2 years or less of his tenure.

Also, there's a non-zero chance he dies or gets incapacitated before he completes his term, or that the 'deep state' bumps him off lol.

[BananaStand]

A better reward for me would be if you started taking your angry cunt classes seriously so we could all put up with you easier. But I know you'll never agree to that.

On the contrary. I'm game.

The video you post has to stay up for at least six months.

do we have a wager?

[Poopadoop]

On the contrary

do we have a wager?

Lol, I just explained why it's not a good bet to take.

Try using your awesome comprehension skills on that and then see if you can suss out the answer to your question from that. I'll give you two guesses so you have at least a better than zero chance of getting it right.

Also, there's no way in hell i believe you have the humility to take professional help seriously. You'd start posting shit on here you copied from some angry cunt self-help website about how it helped you. But we'd all know you were lying, you'd still be a douchebag, and on top of it you'd claim compliance.

It's interesting though that you're actually too stupid to see how transparently fake your promise is.

[BananaStand]

Also, there's no way in hell i believe you have the humility to take professional help seriously.

LOL. You think it's a lack of humility that prevents me from taking it seriously?

No. What's missing is credibility on the part of the so-called 'professionals'

You guys really have no fucking idea how the brain works. So don't go poking around in there.

[Poopadoop]

LOL. You think it's a lack of humility that prevents me from taking it seriously?

That, plus the arrogance evident in the next statement, yes.

What's missing is credibility on the part of the so-called 'professionals'

Best I can gather, all the guy was going to do was talk to you about controlling your anger issues. It doesn't take a genius to see you have them. What do you have to lose by sitting down and talking with someone?

You guys really have no fucking idea how the brain works.

Ya it's complicated. That's why my career choice is such a waste of time I guess. Also cause we can't find the answers using Excel.

So don't go poking around in there.

Actually we do know some things. For example, there's an area called the orbitofrontal cortex that sits right behind the eye sockets that's involved in social behaviour. If it gets damaged, people lose their ability to filter their behaviour appropriately. They might, in an extreme case, swear in church. In more typical cases, they become what a layman might refer to as a 'jerk'.

Coincidentially, I've been wondering - have you ever been in a car accident or received a blow to the head?

[Poopadoop]

LOL. You think it's a lack of humility that prevents me from taking it seriously?

No. What's missing is credibility on the part of the so-called 'professionals'

Ya, but despite all this I'm meant to believe that if you lost a bet you would suddenly take it seriously. Come on man, my IQ isn't as low as yours. Try harder to be credible.

[BananaStand]

And frankly, I don't really think he can get impeached because its too hard for the D to get 2/3 of the house and senate.

He can't get impeached 'cuz he didn't do anything wrong. Deluded twit.

[Poopadoop]

He can't get impeached 'cuz he didn't do anything wrong. Deluded twit.

You have omniscience into all Trump has done I see. Well, I guess he's innocent then.

[BananaStand]

You have omniscience into all Trump has done I see. Well, I guess he's innocent then.

The presumption of innocence is Trump's inalienable right as an American citizen. I don't need omniscience to declare that his innocence is an irrefutable demonstrable objective factual reality.

[Poopadoop]

The presumption of innocence is Trump's inalienable right as an American citizen. I don't need omniscience to declare that his innocence is an irrefutable demonstrable objective factual reality.

Well it's not "irrefutable." It simply hasn't been refuted YET (at least not in a court of law). It's a subtle yet important distinction.

[BananaStand]

Well it's not "irrefutable." It simply hasn't been refuted YET (at least not in a court of law). It's a subtle yet important distinction.

Wow. That's NOT how justice works in America. That's how justice works in your imaginary dreamland where the government is wholly corrupt, but only in ways you like, so it's ok.

[Poopadoop]

Wow. That's NOT how justice works in America. That's how justice works in your imaginary dreamland where the government is wholly corrupt, but only in ways you like, so it's ok.

Nope, you're being a dummy again. Get a dictionary. Honestly it will help you.

There's an objective truth that exists outside of any legal status. Saying a person who hasn't been charged with a crime is "irrefutably, objectively" innocent is just silly. A person either did or did not commit a crime. If they did they are objectively and irrefutably guilty of that crime, whether it's been tried in a court of law or not. They still need to be convicted in court in order to be punished for that crime, but objectively they ARE irrefutably guilty. And if they are irrefutably guilty in an objective sense, then they get convicted in a court, that means their innocence was not irrefutable, since their conviction definitely refutes it.

Arguing that someone is "objectively" innocent of a crime because a) you're personally unaware of any evidence that might impugn them; and b) they've yet to be tried for it in a court of law (presumably this only works if it's an American court of law, because other countriees just throw whoever they like in prison with no trial) is just silly. It's like saying before Newton proved gravity was a thing, gravity "objectively" didn't exist. Of course it did, and you're an idiot if you try to argue otherwise.

[OngBonga]

Well it's not "irrefutable." It simply hasn't been refuted YET (at least not in a court of law). It's a subtle yet important distinction.

Bit thin. Banana is right that Trump's innocence is a presumption protected by law. It's for courts to determine guilt.

Perhaps the word "irrefutable" is the wrong choice, but don't let that allow the point to go over your head.