*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

Sarah Sanders followed his orders and lied to the press. Don Jr was at least complicit in the Trump tower cover up. Lewandowski did talk to Sessions. It was Sessions that refused. But Lewandowski followed orders.

Why aren't these people in jail for obstructing justice??

Was Sarah Sanders obstructing justice? I don't recall that allegation.

[TheSpoonald]

Was Sarah Sanders obstructing justice? I don't recall that allegation.

She told Mueller that she didn't exactly know why Trump fired Comey after she told the press that it was because Trump had lost faith in the FBI director.

And you can't keep dodging the question. Mueller names people other than DJT as complicit or cooperative in these efforts to obstruct justice.. Why aren't those people in jail?

[Poopadoop]

She told Mueller that she didn't exactly know why Trump fired Comey after she told the press that it was because Trump had lost faith in the FBI director.

And you can't keep dodging the question. Mueller names people other than DJT as complicit or cooperative in these efforts to obstruct justice.. Why aren't those people in jail?

You have to show they were intending to OJ when they did their thing. SHS was just talking shit on a podium which is pretty much her job. They aren't even her own words lol. She wasn't actively complicit in some effort to obstruct the MI.

[TheSpoonald]

You have to show they were intending to OJ when they did their thing.

I do? Mueller does? Funny, he didn't seem to provide a single shred of evidence demonstrating DJT's intent on any of those 10 allegations. Why is Trump held to a different standard? Why are Trump's intentions suspect?

SHS was just talking shit on a podium

See Allegation 4. Trump was just talking shit on Twitter. What's the difference??

She wasn't actively complicit in some effort to obstruct the MI

How do you know? Sounds like shes not-not-guilty to me.

[Poopadoop]

I do? Mueller does? Funny, he didn't seem to provide a single shred of evidence demonstrating DJT's intent on any of those 10 allegations.

Intention is impossible to prove conclusively, it can only be inferred from a behaviour or pattern of behaviour.

SHS's intention was most likely to be a lying shill for the POTUS. Her behaviour was entirely consistent with her role in the WH. That doesn't mean she deliberately sought to OJ of her own accord.

Why is Trump held to a different standard?

He isn't.

Why are Trump's intentions suspect?

Because he's the one who stands to gain. Because it's less important if the PS lies to do her job of being a liar than if the POTUS lies to OJ of an investigation into his possible traitorous activities.

[TheSpoonald]

Because he's the one who stands to gain. Because it's less important if the PS lies to do her job of being a liar than if the POTUS lies to OJ of an investigation into his possible traitorous activities.

So the press secretary's job is to be a liar, but the POTUS's job isn't.

Are you 5 years old?

[Poopadoop]

So the press secretary's job is to be a liar, but the POTUS's job isn't.

Are you 5 years old?

yes I am, you're losing an argument to a five year old.

[TheSpoonald]

Intention is impossible to prove conclusively, it can only be inferred from a behaviour or pattern of behaviour.

So politicians have been lying to the press since the press was invented. Is that a pattern of behavior? What should we do with all the people who fit that pattern of behavior?

Is there any reason to single one of them out for special prosecution for OOJ for doing the same thing every other politician has ever done?

Help me understand why lying to the press, 3 of Mueller's 10 accusations, is an impeachable offense?

[Poopadoop]

So politicians have been lying to the press since the press was invented. Is that a pattern of behavior? What should we do with all the people who fit that pattern of behavior?

Is there any reason to single one of them out for special prosecution for OOJ for doing the same thing every other politician has ever done?

Help me understand why lying to the press, 3 of Mueller's 10 accusations, is an impeachable offense?

Answer my questions first. All of them.

[Poopadoop]

Here's some questions for you:

Is it worse to lie to OJ into a criminal investigation about you or to lie to your auntie that you like her new hairdo? Why is one worse than the other?

If someone tells you something and you repeat it, then later it's proven to be false, does that mean you've obstructed justice by lying?

If you're given a choice of voting in a criminal retard for four more years and a less-criminal, more intelligent person, who would you choose and why?

If someone believes they aren't allowed to conclude A, and they conclude nothing instead, does that mean that A is false?

What do you think the 2nd amendment means? Should you be allowed to carry a hand grenade on your person?

Is it possible to build an impregnable barrier along a country's border?

[TheSpoonald]

Is it worse to lie to OJ into a criminal investigation about you or to lie to your auntie that you like her new hairdo? Why is one worse than the other?

Because if you're lying to obstruct justice, then it means you're talking to a sworn law enforcement agent investigating a crime. That's worse than lying to your auntie. In Trump's case, he wasn't lying to an officer. He was lying to Twitter. Lying to your Auntie is worse.

If someone tells you something and you repeat it, then later it's proven to be false, does that mean you've obstructed justice by lying?

It depends. Were you talking to a sworn law enforcement officer? If so, he's probably trained to ask questions like "did you see that happen? Or did someone just tell you about it"? So I don't see how that situation could possibly result in OOJ.

If you're given a choice of voting in a criminal retard for four more years and a less-criminal, more intelligent person, who would you choose and why?

Ivanka. Because she's a fucking goddess.

If someone believes they aren't allowed to conclude A, and they conclude nothing instead, does that mean that A is false?

It definitely does not mean it's true. Apparently the word we use for that is "interesting"

What do you think the 2nd amendment means? Should you be allowed to carry a hand grenade on your person?

I'm actually not the person you wanna talk to about this. I think 12 year olds should be allowed to buy bazookas.

Is it possible to build an impregnable barrier along a country's border?

Ask Israel

[Poopadoop]

It definitely does not mean it's true. Apparently the word we use for that is "interesting"

Yes or no answer please. Does it mean A is false?

And a follow-up:

If the answer is 'no' then are you an idiot if you argue that it does mean A is false?

[Poopadoop]

And if you don't stop being a tool, I'll call in my big sister who is eight and she'll really clean your clock.